2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80044-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of ventilation of thresholds in trained cyclists during ramp cycle exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
32
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The first (aerobic level -AeL) and second ventilatory thresholds level (Anaerobic level -AnL) were estimated by methods described and validated by Weston and Gabbett (2001). The indicators for AeL were: the first nonlinear increases in the VE curve; the first increase VE/Vo2 curve while the VE/Vco2 slope remains constant; the inflexion point between Vo2 and Vco2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first (aerobic level -AeL) and second ventilatory thresholds level (Anaerobic level -AnL) were estimated by methods described and validated by Weston and Gabbett (2001). The indicators for AeL were: the first nonlinear increases in the VE curve; the first increase VE/Vo2 curve while the VE/Vco2 slope remains constant; the inflexion point between Vo2 and Vco2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the incremental test, the O2 and CO2 analysers were calibrated using medical grade gases of known concentration that spanned the physiological range. Gas exchange data were analysed to define the V O2MAX and second ventilatory threshold (VT2), following descriptions from Weston and Gabbett 16 .…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…%SEM = 4,8 -6,8 und VT 2: ICC = 0,96) [26,27,41,42]. Zu beachten ist jedoch eine Studie, die als Ergebnis einen geringeren ICC bezüglich der VT 1 aufweist (VT 1: ICC = 0,77; %SEM = 6,1 und VT 2: ICC = 0,93; %SEM = 3,3) [42].…”
Section: Reliabilität Der Wichtigsten Größen Der Fahrradergospirometrieunclassified
“…%SEM = 4,8 -6,8 und VT 2: ICC = 0,96) [26,27,41,42]. Zu beachten ist jedoch eine Studie, die als Ergebnis einen geringeren ICC bezüglich der VT 1 aufweist (VT 1: ICC = 0,77; %SEM = 6,1 und VT 2: ICC = 0,93; %SEM = 3,3) [42]. Bei dieser Studie ist allerdings zu berücksichtigen, dass die VT 1 und die VT 2 automatisch mit einer Software bestimmt wurden [42] und somit im Gegensatz zu unserer Studie auf eine Plausibilitätsprüfung durch erfahrene Untersucher verzichtet wurde [13,26].…”
Section: Reliabilität Der Wichtigsten Größen Der Fahrradergospirometrieunclassified