2015 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/emsoft.2015.7318257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Requirements driven falsification with coverage metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The static switched system has no dynamics and is included to show that both max and additive semantics can worsen the performance of falsification, compared to falsifying with Boolean semantics. The model is inspired by [43], and it has two inputs (u 1 , u 2 ) ∈ [0, 1] 2 which are kept constant. The model contains 16 blocks in total.…”
Section: Static Switched Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static switched system has no dynamics and is included to show that both max and additive semantics can worsen the performance of falsification, compared to falsifying with Boolean semantics. The model is inspired by [43], and it has two inputs (u 1 , u 2 ) ∈ [0, 1] 2 which are kept constant. The model contains 16 blocks in total.…”
Section: Static Switched Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Static Switched (SS) System: The static switched system is a model without any dynamics that is included as a simple case. The model is inspired by [30].…”
Section: B Additional Benchmark Problems 1) Automatic Transmission (At )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, we sometimes divide the difficulty into small pieces-first get x 1 and x 2 simultaneously at a peak; then get x 3 and x 4 at a peak; finally, try to make them synchronize. Let us introduce formulas ϕ 12 and ϕ 34 such that falsifying them means matching the peak of x 1 , x 2 , and x 3 , x 4 respectively. Decomposing ϕ into ϕ 12 and ϕ 34 might help us in falsification for the following reasons.…”
Section: Example Model 2: Coincidental Sine Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%