Requirements for a Dashboard to Support Quality Improvement Teams in Pain Management

Abstract

Pain management is often considered lower priority than many other aspects of health management in hospitals. However, there is potential for Quality Improvement (QI) teams to improve pain management by visualising and exploring pain data sets. Although dashboards are already used by QI teams in hospitals, there is limited evidence of teams accessing visualisations to support their decision making. This study aims to identify the needs of the QI team in a UK Critical Care Unit (CCU) and develop dashboards that visualise longitudinal data on the efficacy of patient pain management to assist the team in making informed decisions to improve pain management within the CCU. This research is based on an analysis of transcripts of interviews with healthcare professionals with a variety of roles in the CCU and their evaluation of probes. We identified two key uses of pain data: direct patient care (focusing on individual patient data) and QI (aggregating data across the CCU and over time); in this paper, we focus on the QI role. We have identified how CCU staff currently interpret information and determine what supplementary information can better inform their decision making and support sensemaking. From these, a set of data visualisations has been proposed, for integration with the hospital electronic health record. These visualisations are being iteratively refined in collaboration with CCU staff and technical staff responsible for maintaining the electronic health record. The paper presents user requirements for QI in pain management and a set of visualisations, including the design rationale behind the various methods proposed for visualising and exploring pain data using dashboards.

Involving Health Professionals in the Development of Quality and Safety Dashboards: Qualitative Study

“…While some of these have been shown to improve quality and safety outcomes [13,14], overall the benefit of quality and safety dashboards is contested, with recent paradigms attributing the absence of improvements to a lack of inclusion of health professionals' perspectives [10][11][12]. Studies have shown that without the inclusion of health professionals during development, these dashboards can lack usefulness (eg, display content that is perceived as irrelevant and unreliable by the user) and usability (eg, visualize data in an incomprehensible way) [10,11,20]. Moreover, enforcing the use of dashboards in a "top-down" manner can interfere with professionals' autonomy and routines, making dashboards a burden to users [12,21].…”

Setting Requirements for a Dashboard to Inform Portuguese Decision-Makers About Environment Health in an Urban Setting

“…New digital tools are emerging rapidly, with health and environmental institutions increasingly collecting larger amounts of data and facing novel opportunities to adopt technologies to manage such data for improved decision-making (1)(2)(3). Nevertheless, the way data is being gathered, analyzed and reported to policymakers has been far from enabling structured analyses and from identifying relevant policy issues in the environmental health (EH) domain (4).…”