Rescuing A Patient In Deteriorating Situations (RAPIDS): A simulation-based educational program on recognizing, responding and reporting of physiological signs of deterioration

Liaw, Sok Ying; Rethans, Jan‐Joost; Scherpbier, Albert; Klainin‐Yobas, Piyanee

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.014

Cited by 60 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…High intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 was yielded. Construct validity reported in a previous study (Liaw et al, 2011) The PEARS test is a written exam of 24 Multiple -choice questions to test knowledge retention The MHPTS evaluates team performance and has shown satisfactory internal consistency as well as satisfactory construct validity through RASCH analysis (Bultas et al, 2014) (2013) Gilfoyle et al (2007) Johnson et al (2014) Bultas et al (2014) Gillman et al (2016) Checklist to measure communication (validity established through expert review, feedback, and pilot testing) Score-based, non-validated checklist to evaluate performance Weighted checklist to evaluate performance (inter-rater reliability established in a pilot study) PEARS Behavioural Measures Check-off Tool to score team behaviours, skills, and tasks performed Based on Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) standards Knowledge Questionnaires…”

Section: Assessment Measuresmentioning

confidence: 83%

“…It is also possible that using the same scenario as in the Gilfoyle et al (2007) study, participants memorized the scenario and thus the response. This use of the same scenario was also listed as a limitation in Bultas et al (2014) and Liaw et al (2011).…”

Section: Comparison Of Results To Existing Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…As noted above, all of the studies reviewed included simulation-based learning using a high-fidelity simulator. Thirteen studies compared pre-test and post-test results following an HFS learning program (Buckley & Gordon, 2011;Dadiz et al, 2013;DeVita et al, 2005;Gilfoyle et al, 2007;Huseman, 2012;Jankouskas et al, 2007;Liaw et al, 2011;Przybyl et al, 2015;Schubert, 2012;Shinnick & Woo, 2013;Sittner et al, 2009;Straka et al, 2012;Wolf, 2008). Standard education was compared to standard education plus HFS learning in four studies (Hall, 2015;Jankouskas et al, 2011;Maneval et al, 2012;Singer et al, 2013).…”

Section: Overview Of Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Development of Crisis Resource Management Skills: A Literature Review

Lucas

Edwards

2017

Clinical Simulation in Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this repeated-measures observational study, eleven acute care and critical care registered nurse participants were evaluated at four different time points to measure the effect of an education program on observed performance of crisis resource management (CRM) skills.Performance was measured using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale and a checklist developed for this study. One-on-one semi-structured interviews also assessed nurses' perceptions of the learning that occurred in the education program. Results were mixed with statistically significant changes in mean scores occurring between time one and time two and non-statistically significant improvement in mean scores overall. Interview results indicated nurses perceived a high degree of learning through passive observer roles as well as active responder roles. This study adds to the body of evidence on the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation education programs and highlights the need for further research in multiple areas. AL Thesis CRM Skills 3Acknowledgements

show abstract

Section: Assessment Measuresmentioning

confidence: 83%

Section: Comparison Of Results To Existing Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overview Of Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development of Crisis Resource Management Skills: A Literature Review

Lucas

Edwards

2017

Clinical Simulation in Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The CPR procedure is a coordinated integration of chest compression-induced circulation, rescue breathing and airway management whereby priorities are determined by evidence from literature and practice. Nursing students are instructed to carry out CPR effectively through resuscitation of knowledge and skills in different settings such as the simulation lab for improving learning out comes [8] .The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of educational program for CPR using SimMan versus traditional manikin on 2 nd year nursing student's performance at Medical Surgical Nursing Department laboratory-Faculty of Nursing -Benha University.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Educational Program for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Simman versus TraditionalManikin on 2nd Year Nursing Students’ Performance

Abdallah¹,

Sapour²,

Mohammed³

2017

IOSR JNHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A setting may be considered well-elaborated and realistic when it allows a physical evaluation to be carried out by the individual, training technical skills, and critical thinking related to the role the nurse performed facing the simulated situation (11)(12) . Debriefing is the most important component in the simulation, and it has been the subject of extensive research regarding its execution.…”

Section: Validación Para La Lengua Portuguesa De La Debriefi Ng Expermentioning

confidence: 99%

Validação para a língua portuguesa da Debriefing Experience Scale

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to translate and validate to Portuguese the Debriefi ng Experience Scale jointly with individuals that used highfi delity simulation in learning. Method: methodological and exploratory study for an instrument translation and validation. For the validation process, the event "III Workshop Brazil -Portugal: Care Delivery to Critical Patients" was created. Results: 103 nurses attended. Validity and reliability of the scale, the correlation pattern among variables, the sampling adequacy test, and the sphericity test showed good results. Since there was no relationship among the groups established in the exploratory factor analysis, the option was to follow the division established by the original version. Conclusion: the version of the instrument was called Escala de Experiência com o Debriefi ng. The results showed good psychometric properties and a good potential for use. However, further studies will contribute to consolidate the validity of the scale and strengthen its potential use. Descriptors: Simulation; Teaching; Nursing Education; Patient Simulation; Debriefi ng. RESUMO Objetivo: traduzir e validar para língua portuguesa a Debriefi ng Experience Scale junto a indivíduos que utilizaram a simulação de alta fi delidade na sua formação. Método: estudo do tipo metodológico, exploratório de tradução e validação de instrumento. Para o processo de validação criou-se o evento: III Workshop Brasil -Portugal: Atendimento ao Paciente Crítico. Resultados: participaram 103 enfermeiros. A validade e fi delidade da escala, o padrão de correlação entre as variáveis, o teste de adequação amostral e o teste de esfericidade apresentaram bons resultados. Por não haver nexo entre os agrupamentos estabelecidos na análise fatorial exploratória optou-se por seguir a divisão estabelecida pela versão original. Conclusão: o instrumento foi denominado: Escala de Experiência com o Debriefi ng. Os resultados constataram boas propriedades psicométricas e um bom potencial de utilização, porém futuros trabalhos contribuirão para consolidar a validade da escala e reforçar o seu potencial de utilização. Descritores: Simulação; Ensino; Educação em Enfermagem; Simulação de Paciente; Debriefi ng. RESUMEN Objetivo: traducir y validar para el portugués la Debriefi ng Experience Scale con individuos que utilizaron la simulación de alta fi delidad en su formación. Método: estudio metodológico, exploratorio de traducción y validación de instrumento. Para el proceso de validación, se organizó el evento III Workshop Brasil -Portugal: Atención del Paciente Crítico. Resultados: Participaron 103 enfermeros. La validez y fi delidad de la escala, el estándar de correlación entre las variables, el test de adecuación muestral y el test de esfericidad expresaron buenos resultados. Por no existir nexo entre los agrupamientos establecidos en el análisis factorial exploratorio, se optó por seguir la división determinada por la versión original. Conclusión: el instrumento fue retitulado como Escala de Experiencia con el Debriefi ng. Los result...

show abstract

Rescuing A Patient In Deteriorating Situations (RAPIDS): A simulation-based educational program on recognizing, responding and reporting of physiological signs of deterioration

Cited by 60 publications

References 28 publications

Development of Crisis Resource Management Skills: A Literature Review

Development of Crisis Resource Management Skills: A Literature Review

Effect of Educational Program for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Simman versus TraditionalManikin on 2nd Year Nursing Students’ Performance

Validação para a língua portuguesa da Debriefing Experience Scale

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About