2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.587-589.1668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Prestressed Loss in Curving Hole of Prestressed Concrete Structure Caused by Frictional Resistance

Abstract: Excessive prestressed loss in prestressed concrete continuous beam bridge and continuous rigid frame bridge causes structures appearing different types of diseases. By theoretical analysis on computational expression of effective prestress in curving hole, and distribution of contact stress and experiment about prestressed loss caused by frictional resistance, this paper points out the disadvantages of current effective prestress formula in curving hole. According to the research on the major influencing facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CLS concrete with large elastic modulus is sensitive to the increase in concrete age, and the creep and shrinkage is more obvious than normal concrete [2]. When compared with long-term pre-stress loss [5][6][7][8], the instantaneous loss caused by friction also significantly affects the initial pre-stress force of the tendon [10][11][12][13][14][15]. The effective force inevitably decreases due to the friction loss between the pre-stressing tendon and duct [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLS concrete with large elastic modulus is sensitive to the increase in concrete age, and the creep and shrinkage is more obvious than normal concrete [2]. When compared with long-term pre-stress loss [5][6][7][8], the instantaneous loss caused by friction also significantly affects the initial pre-stress force of the tendon [10][11][12][13][14][15]. The effective force inevitably decreases due to the friction loss between the pre-stressing tendon and duct [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%