“…In addition, sulfur is abundant in elemental resources, with much lower price ($150 ton –1 ) than that of LiCoO 2 ($10,000 ton –1 ), so it has attracted much attention. − Lithium–sulfur batteries have made important progress in recent years. , However, the demand for lithium resources has exploded with the rapid development of power vehicles, which will inevitably lead to a shortage of metal lithium resources and a sharp rise in prices. , Similar to the mechanism and performance of lithium–sulfur batteries, lower-cost sodium–sulfur batteries may become a better choice for portable and stationary energy storage . High-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries with molten sodium, sulfur electrodes, and solid-alumina electrolyte are currently commercially available. , The system has obvious advantages in terms of reasonable energy and power density, good stability at high temperature, high efficiency, and long operation life. , However, the high activity and corrosiveness of molten electrodes under elevated temperature conditions bring serious safety hazards. In addition, operation temperatures exceeding 300 °C also require extremely high operating costs.…”