Researching Children: Are We Getting it Right?: A Discussion of Ethics

Abstract

As the role of children in society becomes more prominent, their participation in research seems set to increase. In this paper we review whether we are getting the ethics of children's research right. We show that, since the late 1980s, children have been treated universally as a special case and that they have been accorded their own special set of human rights (UNCRC), which primarily grants them rights to protection and participation. We go on to argue (with practical examples) that the core MRS research principles of well-being, voluntary informed consent and privacy/confidentiality must be applied to children with particular caution and care. We note that, as research with children grows and as new techniques are developed, we are presented with fresh challenges for keeping children safe and maintaining their trust. We end by presenting the results of a survey that sought children's views on being research participants in a quite sensitive piece of research. We found that children are highly appreciative of being consulted about their lives in general and being asked about their feelings. However we also found that some children can be uncomfortable with some of the issues raised and can feel compelled to answer the questions. We conclude that, while we have good industry codes, ethics evolves with shifting social, political and cultural patterns, and we need to keep challenging ourselves to maintain best practice.

Prevalence and Risk-Markers of Self-Harm in Autistic Children and Adults

“…A proportion of this dataset, participants whose adaptive function suggests lower than average IQ, was reported previously in Richards et al ( 2012 ). Additionally, only 23% (n = 19) of the sample were adults and therefore given the ethical constraints of asking children about self-harm (Nairn and Clarke 2012 ), and the potential lack of capacity for younger individuals to complete the questionnaire pack independently, informant report methods, were deemed most appropriate.…”

The Child Protection in Sport Unit – Supporting National Governing Bodies in Hearing the Voices of Children: An Evaluation of Current Practice

“…This paper presents findings of a study commissioned in the UK by the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children's Child Protection in Sport Unit (NSPCC CPSU) to investigate the provision of opportunities for children to express their voices within the national governing bodies (NGBs) of sport. Within human rights legislation, children are to be consulted on policy issues that affect them (Cremin et al ., 2011; Everley, 2018; Hartill and Prescott, 2007; Nairn and Clarke, 2012), including in the organisation of sport (NSPCC CPSU, 2018). Good safeguarding practice involves incorporating children's views and is crucial to understanding needs and enhancing participation in decision‐making (Dave and Rao, 2012; Goh and Baruch, 2018; Willow, 2014).…”

On foot, in the shopping cart or in the buggy: the influence of children on supermarket shopping

“…After that, we performed on-site observations in supermarkets (parents and children). Collecting empirical data on-site presents many difficulties and when children are the object of the collection, this difficulty increases; observation is an alternative method employed to access empirical data with this audience (Baxter, 2012;Nairn & Clarke, 2012;Veloso et al, 2008).…”