2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02155-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resection of liver metastases from breast cancer: a multicentre analysis

Abstract: Background Surgery is becoming more practical and effective than conservative treatment in improving the poor outcomes of patients with breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM). However, there is no generally acknowledged set of standards for identifying BCLM candidates who will benefit from surgery. Methods Between January 2011 and September 2018, 67 female BCLM patients who underwent partial hepatectomy were selected for analysis in the present study. Prognostic factors after hepatectomy were determined. Univar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the substantial evidence for local treatment of colorectal liver metastases, the data for resection of BCLM are limited. In heterogenous case series the reported median 3-, and 5-year survival rates after metastasectomy of BCLM range between 24–116 months, and 49–94% and 5–78%, respectively [3,10,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. In a systematic review Fairhurst et al [55] analyzed 33 papers dealing with resection of BCLM in a total of 956 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the substantial evidence for local treatment of colorectal liver metastases, the data for resection of BCLM are limited. In heterogenous case series the reported median 3-, and 5-year survival rates after metastasectomy of BCLM range between 24–116 months, and 49–94% and 5–78%, respectively [3,10,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. In a systematic review Fairhurst et al [55] analyzed 33 papers dealing with resection of BCLM in a total of 956 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, response to preoperative systemic therapy has been identified as a prognostic factor which is likely related to effective systemic eradication of microscopic metastatic lesions [3,21,30]. In addition, complete macroscopic and microscopic resection (R0) [3,29,30,32,40], liver-limited disease (with the exception of isolated pulmonary and bony metastases) [23,39,59], solitary BCLM [36,41], a long interval (more than 1 year) between breast cancer diagnosis and the detection of BCLM [21,28,29,35,37,57] and patients with PgR- and/or ER-positive BCLM [21,22,23,27,30,34,60] were independent prognostic factors. In conclusion at least a selected group of patients with BCLM benefits from aggressive local curative treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study reported the rst discovery of the functional role of the DNA of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in promoting breast cancer liver metastasis, a mechanism distinct from previous studies on cytokines and chemokine receptors, integrin complexes, metabolic program and proliferation signaling [27,28]. Early detection of liver metastases seemed to confer better outcomes of speci c patients due to more effective treatments and better tolerance [29][30][31][32][33][34]. However, guidelines have reiterated that routine laboratory and imaging examination may not be applicable for patients with early breast cancer in the absence of signs or symptoms of metastatic disease because these examinations may not bring more survival bene ts [35][36][37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hepatic resection is the most published intervention for management of BCLM (Table 2). Of 23 studies, 13 provided mean diameter of liver metastasis (8,9,14,19,21,(24)(25)(26)(29)(30)(31)(32). The median tumor size was 3 cm (1.8-5.2 cm).…”
Section: Hepatic Resectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her2 positive tumors totaled 117 patients. Nineteen studies reported mean time between diagnosis of primary of liver metastasis (8,9,13,(15)(16)(17)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). Six studies provided details of receptor status at time of hepatectomy (16,17,20,25,28,30).…”
Section: Hepatic Resectionmentioning
confidence: 99%