Dividends and Dividend Policy 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9781118258408.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Dividend Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As Baker () states, MM's unconventional and controversial conclusion about DP irrelevance stirred a heated debate that has reverberated throughout the finance community for decades. The DP theories developed are the following:The dividend irrelevance theory, where dividend payout policy does not affect overall firm value in perfect capital markets (Ang and Ciccone, ).The residual DP theory, where managers exhaust all available positive net present value investments and then pay the residual cash flow as dividend (Smith, ).The tax clientele effects theory, where investors prefer firms to retain cash instead of pay dividends because the tax rate on dividends is typically higher than on long‐term capital gains (Saadi and Dutta, ).The cash flow signalling hypothesis, where the stock price moves in the same direction as the dividend because dividend changes convey information about the firm's future growth opportunities (Mukherjee, ).The free cash flow hypothesis, where price reacts favourably to the announcement of a dividend increase because this increase reduces the agency cost of free cash flow (funds available to managers for perquisite consumption) (Mukherjee, ).The signalling theory, where unexpected dividend increases (decreases) are associated with significant share‐price increases (decreases) because dividend changes signal future prospects of the firm and thus reduce the information asymmetries existing between firm managers and the market (Filbeck, ).The firm life cycle theory, where the optimal DP of a firm is based on its life cycle. A firm will begin paying dividends when its growth rate and profitability are expected to decline in the future (Bulan and Subramanian, ).The catering theory, where managers cater to investor demand by paying dividends when investors prefer dividend‐paying firms and by not paying dividends (or reducing the dividend) when investors prefer non‐dividend‐paying companies (De Rooij and Renneboog, ).The behavioural theory explains the impact of age, retirement status and income on the relationship between consumer expenditures and the preference for dividends, and a psychological approach to dividend theory explains the relationship between tolerance for risk and the preference for dividends (Shefrin, ).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Baker () states, MM's unconventional and controversial conclusion about DP irrelevance stirred a heated debate that has reverberated throughout the finance community for decades. The DP theories developed are the following:The dividend irrelevance theory, where dividend payout policy does not affect overall firm value in perfect capital markets (Ang and Ciccone, ).The residual DP theory, where managers exhaust all available positive net present value investments and then pay the residual cash flow as dividend (Smith, ).The tax clientele effects theory, where investors prefer firms to retain cash instead of pay dividends because the tax rate on dividends is typically higher than on long‐term capital gains (Saadi and Dutta, ).The cash flow signalling hypothesis, where the stock price moves in the same direction as the dividend because dividend changes convey information about the firm's future growth opportunities (Mukherjee, ).The free cash flow hypothesis, where price reacts favourably to the announcement of a dividend increase because this increase reduces the agency cost of free cash flow (funds available to managers for perquisite consumption) (Mukherjee, ).The signalling theory, where unexpected dividend increases (decreases) are associated with significant share‐price increases (decreases) because dividend changes signal future prospects of the firm and thus reduce the information asymmetries existing between firm managers and the market (Filbeck, ).The firm life cycle theory, where the optimal DP of a firm is based on its life cycle. A firm will begin paying dividends when its growth rate and profitability are expected to decline in the future (Bulan and Subramanian, ).The catering theory, where managers cater to investor demand by paying dividends when investors prefer dividend‐paying firms and by not paying dividends (or reducing the dividend) when investors prefer non‐dividend‐paying companies (De Rooij and Renneboog, ).The behavioural theory explains the impact of age, retirement status and income on the relationship between consumer expenditures and the preference for dividends, and a psychological approach to dividend theory explains the relationship between tolerance for risk and the preference for dividends (Shefrin, ).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DP theories developed are the following:• The dividend irrelevance theory, where dividend payout policy does not affect overall firm value in perfect capital markets (Ang and Ciccone, 2009). • The residual DP theory, where managers exhaust all available positive net present value investments and then pay the residual cash flow as dividend (Smith, 2009). • The tax clientele effects theory, where investors prefer firms to retain cash instead of pay dividends because the tax rate on dividends is typically higher than on long-term capital gains (Saadi and Dutta, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the residual thought can be easily mixed up with one of the various cash adjustment smoothing techniques. In most instances, this is the way it is applied in real-world dividend practice, (Smith, 2009). The proponents of the residual dividends theory argue that a firm may make use of the dividend as a signaling mechanism for investors and other stakeholders.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, dividend forms a sizable chunk in a firm's capital structure (Frank & Goyal, 2003;Aggarwal & Kyaw, 2010). When this happens, the proponents of the residual dividend theory contends that if there is no profitable business opportunities, then firms can only disburse profit, (Baker & Smith, 2006;Smith, 2009). As much as there are proponents of this theory, there are also opponents of the same.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dividends are paid from the firm's retained earnings, which can also be used to invest in core businesses (external opportunities). Dividends are paid after reinvestment in external opportunities, which reflects the firm's residual dividend policy (Smith, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%