“…Clinically, a crown would hardly undergo such great tensile efforts as those applied in this study, but the tested experimental conditions serve as parameters to evaluate different properties and behaviors of the materials used. 8,9 The results of the present study may be explained by the fact that higher preparation height promotes greater superficial area with the crown. Although other factors may influence on crown retention, the preparations were standardized (cervical diameter, taper, roughness, piece fit), thus eliminating or minimizing the interference of these variables on the results.…”