“…The filament-type memristor (FM) is known as one of the most promising technologies for constructing neuromorphic computing systems, − and its intrinsic randomness can be exploited for security hardware such as true random number generators (TRNGs). − However, most FMs exhibit unreliable resistive switching (RS) with device parameters (i.e., set/reset voltages, high/low resistance states) drifting during cycle-to-cycle (C2C) operations, − which severely decreases the learning accuracy of neural networks and damages the probability distribution as required for a TRNG. In response to the challenge, there is a fast-growing interest in developing FM based on 2D nanomaterials (thickness typically <5 nm). − Such a device can exhibit ultralow energy consumption and improved C2C uniformity, because the conducting filaments (CF) can be strictly constricted in atomic-scale regions. − Unfortunately, because of the poor control of local defects (e.g., holes, cracks, folds, wrinkles, and grain boundaries) of polycrystalline 2D layered materials, those devices suffer from unfavorable leakage and inhomogeneous charge conduction, resulting in low production yields and large device-to-device (D2D) variability. − Furthermore, the general performance of memristors based on 2D nanomaterials is not superior to that of traditional memristors based on thick electrolytes, potentially because of the formation of large amounts of CFs, which would induce significant filament instability. , In addition, these atomically thin materials and associated fabrication processes are not fully compatible with the complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology, hindering implementation in practical circuits.…”