2002
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.197
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource implications and health benefits of primary prevention strategies for cardiovascular disease in people aged 30 to 74: mathematical modelling study

Abstract: Objective To develop a model to determine resource costs and health benefits of implementing guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies were excluded as the results were presented in terms of costs per events avoided. 176,177 A further study was excluded as the evaluation explored the cost-effectiveness of statins in several international settings including the UK. 178 The results presented for the UK were not detailed and were generated for comparison between the countries by using country-specific costings only.…”
Section: Quantity and Quality Of Research Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies were excluded as the results were presented in terms of costs per events avoided. 176,177 A further study was excluded as the evaluation explored the cost-effectiveness of statins in several international settings including the UK. 178 The results presented for the UK were not detailed and were generated for comparison between the countries by using country-specific costings only.…”
Section: Quantity and Quality Of Research Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, if this cut-off point for CVD risk pre-stratification was used, only two-fifths of the total population would be required to attend their general practice for more time-and resource-consuming screening tests. This is supported by a modelling study by Marshall and Rouse, 24 which suggests that strategies preselecting patients for risk assessment may reduce staff time and prevent more new cases within available resources, compared with inviting all individuals. However, the authors used a hypothetical population, assuming default blood pressure and bloodcholesterol values for each individual, and used the Framingham score for pre-stratification.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 71%
“…This has been done by Marshall and Rouse for alternative strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease [19]. They estimated what we have called expansion curves convex to the effectiveness axis in costeffectiveness space due to prioritisation of patients with a higher estimated risk of coronary heart disease.…”
Section: Expansion Curve Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%