Response of maize to fertilization with KCl on gleysol of Sava valley area

Kovačević, Vlado; Rastija, Mirta; Rastija, Domagoj; Josipović, Marko; Šeput, Miranda

doi:10.1556/crc.34.2006.2-3.252

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…zinc) and water use can cause a severe depression in yield (a reduction in yield) (Bernivolja 1976;Cramer 1989). Furthermore, with a higher amount of NPK fertilizers during monoculture cultivation we achieve the same yield as with maize cultivated with crop rotation (Nagy 1996;Kovacevic et al 2006).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of production factors on maize yield and yield stability

Sárvári

Pepó

2014

Cereal Research Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Different long-term experiments were carried on chernozem (Debrecen) and loamy (Hajdúböszörmény) soils. They included the most important agrotechnical, biological (hybrid) and agroecological (crop year, soil) factors in maize production. This paper evaluated the results of polyfactorial long-term experiments. For the maize the most favourable crop rotation was winter wheat (in a tri-culture) with an N 60-120, P 2 O 5 60-70, K 2 O and 90-110 kg ha -1 , and a density of 75-90,000 plants ha -1 . The different input levels of maize crop management systems can modify an adaptive capacity to ecological conditions and the resilience of agro-ecosystems. The optimalization of agrotechnical elements reduces the harmful climatic effects. The yields of maize varied between 2-11 t ha -1 in extensive and 10-15 t ha -1 in intensive crop management systems, respectively.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…The NPK fertilisers and the soil's AL-soluble, P, and K content are not only affected by the intensity of the fertilization, but also by the crop rotation and the agro-techniques applied (Andersson and Hermann 1992;Liang and MacKenzie 1994;Kovacevic et al 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of production factors on maize yield and yield stability

Sárvári

Pepó

2014

Cereal Research Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…the most important plant nutrient enhances maize yield [ [97] , [98] , [99] ]. However, balanced supply of plant nutrients at different growth stages is crucial to achieve required yields [ [100] , [101] , [102] ]. Nitrogen fertilisation enhances protein synthesis [ 103 ], and increases maize yield [ 104 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of research on maize production challenges in Hungary

Ssemugenze,

Ocwa,

Bojtor

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…According to [10] maize tolerates partial monocultures but grown in a monoculture it produced 1.3 t ha -1 less yield in an average of years and 3 to 4 t ha -1 less in a drought year compared to the yield achieved in crop rotation. Maize requires harmonic NPK supply but nitrogen has the most important role among macro nutrients [11,12]. Experiments by [13] between 2008 and 2010 proved that there was a significant relationship between fertilization and harvested productions of maize.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The study of changes in the assimilation surface, relative chlorophyll content and maize yield with different agrotechnical factors

Vári¹,

Pepó²

2014

WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research focused on the effects of previous crop, fertilization and irrigation on the Leaf Area Index (LAI) and relative chlorophyll content (SPAD) of maize and the amount of yield in three different crop years. We were also looking for the relations between these parameters. As an average of the three years, the year, the crop rotation, the irrigation and the fertilization had a 3.5%, 29.8%, 21.5% and 45.2% share in the yield, respectively. The maximum SPAD-values were measured at tasseling and silking periods depending upon the year. In all three crop rotation models, significant differences were found between the control and the fertilization levels of N120-180+PK. As a result of irrigation, an increasing trend can be observed in the SPAD. The maximum LAI were measured at the 12-leaf or tassel depending on the period of the year. The dynamics and maximum value of the LAI were significantly determined by fertilization. Crop rotation had a strong effect, though it varied with the year. There were no significant differences in leaf area between the irrigated and the non-irrigated treatments. The fertilization had the strongest impact (r = 0.533-0.723) on yield among the agrotechnical elements. The correlation between the crop rotation and the yield was significant but weak (r = 0.336-0.423), while irrigation had a loose, non-significant correlation with yield in 2011 and 2012. In 2013, irrigation had a greater influence on the yield than in 2011 and 2012 (r = 0.497).

show abstract

Response of maize to fertilization with KCl on gleysol of Sava valley area

Cited by 8 publications

References 4 publications

Effect of production factors on maize yield and yield stability

Effect of production factors on maize yield and yield stability

Impact of research on maize production challenges in Hungary

The study of changes in the assimilation surface, relative chlorophyll content and maize yield with different agrotechnical factors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About