2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of western Oregon (USA) stream temperatures to contemporary forest management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
75
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Solar radiation reaching the stream is influenced by different topographic factors, including the prevailing riparian vegetation buffer, which can decrease incoming energy by up to 95% (Rutherford et al, 1997;Moore et al, 2005;DeWalle, 2010). During summer heatwave periods in particular, solar energy plays a key role in influencing stream energy heat budget, and consequently stream water temperature (Johnson, 2004;Leach and Moore, 2010;Groom et al, 2011). Hence shading through riparian vegetation, primarily in small to medium sized and slowly flowing lowland rivers, is often most relevant to avoid excessive heating in order to mitigate adverse effects on the ecosystem (Ghermandi et al, 2009;He et al, 2011;Holzapfel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solar radiation reaching the stream is influenced by different topographic factors, including the prevailing riparian vegetation buffer, which can decrease incoming energy by up to 95% (Rutherford et al, 1997;Moore et al, 2005;DeWalle, 2010). During summer heatwave periods in particular, solar energy plays a key role in influencing stream energy heat budget, and consequently stream water temperature (Johnson, 2004;Leach and Moore, 2010;Groom et al, 2011). Hence shading through riparian vegetation, primarily in small to medium sized and slowly flowing lowland rivers, is often most relevant to avoid excessive heating in order to mitigate adverse effects on the ecosystem (Ghermandi et al, 2009;He et al, 2011;Holzapfel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such considerations can be incorporated using the same type of terrain analysis of additional topographic and vegetation attributes and other appropriate models and data. For example, intrinsic fish habitat potential can be estimated using channel slope, valley constraint (valley width/channel width), and mean annual flow (e.g., ; large wood supply to streams can be estimated using a tree height layer and tree mortality rates (e.g., Benda et al, 2015b;Flitcroft et al, 2016); and thermal loading to streams and effects of riparian shade can be estimated from a vegetation basal area and height layer and bare earth radiation calculations (e.g., Groom et al, 2011). Ultimately the various characterizations of intrinsic fish habitat, sediment supply, large wood supply, stream temperature, and other parameters of interest can be overlain and combined into a robust analysis to delineate and prioritize the most beneficial restoration locations across watersheds and landscapes (e.g., Benda et al, 2007).…”
Section: Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most influential factors regulating stream temperature is riparian vegetation (Caissie, 2006;Groom et al, 2011;Johnson, 2004;Moore et al, 2005;Rutherford et al, 1997). The streamside vegetation buffer width (Clark et al, 1999), vegetation density and average tree height all have a strong influence on stream temperature (Sridhar et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%