2016
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to CO2 enrichment of understory vegetation in the shade of forests

Abstract: Responses of forest ecosystems to increased atmospheric CO2 concentration have been studied in few free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments during last two decades. Most studies focused principally on the overstory trees with little attention given to understory vegetation. Despite its small contribution to total productivity of an ecosystem, understory vegetation plays an important role in predicting successional dynamics and future plant community composition. Thus, the response of understory vegetation in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trees can enhance productivity and modify some anatomical and physiological traits (e.g., iWUE) in response to eCO 2 , but it is not known how they will perform under future climate and c a (Medlyn & De Kauwe, ; Duursma et al ., ; Kelly et al ., ). A positive net effect of eCO 2 on trees can be hampered by the limiting effect of other environmental constraints such as nitrogen (N) availability and water stress (De Kauwe et al ., ; Reichstein et al ., ; Fernández‐Martínez et al ., ; Walker et al ., ; Kim et al ., ). A positive feedback of eCO 2 , for example, in leaf area (if a steady state has not been achieved yet; Körner, ) and NPP, has been reported under current climate conditions in temperate forests where nonclimatic factors such as N availability were limiting (Medlyn et al ., ; Walker et al ., ; Kim et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees can enhance productivity and modify some anatomical and physiological traits (e.g., iWUE) in response to eCO 2 , but it is not known how they will perform under future climate and c a (Medlyn & De Kauwe, ; Duursma et al ., ; Kelly et al ., ). A positive net effect of eCO 2 on trees can be hampered by the limiting effect of other environmental constraints such as nitrogen (N) availability and water stress (De Kauwe et al ., ; Reichstein et al ., ; Fernández‐Martínez et al ., ; Walker et al ., ; Kim et al ., ). A positive feedback of eCO 2 , for example, in leaf area (if a steady state has not been achieved yet; Körner, ) and NPP, has been reported under current climate conditions in temperate forests where nonclimatic factors such as N availability were limiting (Medlyn et al ., ; Walker et al ., ; Kim et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the CO 2 fertilization effect, Kimball (1983), Chang et al (2016), Kim et al (2016) and Schmid et al (2016) stated that as CO 2 level increased, vegetation yield changed, and the change was however related to the environment conditions such as light, soil nutrient and soil moisture and temperature. We assume that the CO 2 fertilization effects can be reflected from the changes in photosynthesis and net primary productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased CO 2 concentrations enhance light-saturated photosynthetic rate and growth under shade (DeLucia and Thomas 2000; Kim et al 2015), and also result in higher soluble carbohydrate concentrations within plants (e.g. Tjoelker et al 1998).…”
Section: Elevated Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in species' growth responsiveness and leaf area production might therefore alter vegetation dynamics significantly in atmospheres with elevated CO 2 . Information on the responses of many species to elevated CO 2 is lacking, however, complicating inclusion of the effects of CO 2 concentration on shade tolerance into global models (Kim et al 2015).…”
Section: Elevated Comentioning
confidence: 99%