2018
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness of the ACTIVLIMCP questionnaire: measuring global activity performance in children with cerebral palsy

Abstract: Good responsiveness of ACTIVLIM-CP questionnaire during intensive motor-skill learning intervention. Higher responsiveness for children in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels III and IV versus I and II after intensive intervention. ACTIVLIM-CP is useful to identify children improving their performance after botulinum neurotoxin-A injection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Manual Form Perception Test (MFPT) as modified by Cooper et al [ 35 ] assessed stereognosis. Walking endurance was tested using the 6-Minutes-Walk Test [ 36 ] (6MWT), and we used parent-reported questionnaires to evaluate the child’s performance and transfer of learning to daily life activities requiring the use of upper extremities (ABILHAND-Kids [ 37 , 38 ]), locomotor abilities (ABILOCO-Kids [ 39 ]), and the coordination of both the upper and lower extremities (ACTIVLIM-CP [ 40 , 41 ]; Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory [ 42 ] PEDI). For the PEDI questionnaire, we used only the self-care subscale functional ability domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Manual Form Perception Test (MFPT) as modified by Cooper et al [ 35 ] assessed stereognosis. Walking endurance was tested using the 6-Minutes-Walk Test [ 36 ] (6MWT), and we used parent-reported questionnaires to evaluate the child’s performance and transfer of learning to daily life activities requiring the use of upper extremities (ABILHAND-Kids [ 37 , 38 ]), locomotor abilities (ABILOCO-Kids [ 39 ]), and the coordination of both the upper and lower extremities (ACTIVLIM-CP [ 40 , 41 ]; Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory [ 42 ] PEDI). For the PEDI questionnaire, we used only the self-care subscale functional ability domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 532 general movements are predictive of neural, motor and cognitive 533 outcomes in children with CP and DCD [12,22,24,26,69]. Thus, our 534 animal studies MIUH and postnatal SMR support the idea that 535 developmental maladaptive plasticity may lead to long-lasting 536 disturbances of motor outputs, as observed in CP and DCD, and 537 point out the pertinence of early rehabilitative programs, such as 538 the Care Toy System [71] or HABIT-ILE [72]. According to the self-539 perpetuating cycles and putative mechanisms described above, we 540 strongly believe that rehabilitation needs to focus on physical and 541 cognitive training leading to adaptive brain plasticity and improve 542 the physical body situation, because both appear to continuously 543…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This t-value indicates whether the pre-to post-intervention change for a given child reflects a true change or simply a measurement error [34]. After the calculation of the individual t-values, the children were divided into five classes of clinical significance according to the change in APS or AVS: significant decrease (t ≤ 1.96), decrease (1.96 < t < 0), no change (t = 0), increase (0 > t > 1.96), and significant increase (t ≥ 1.96) [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%