2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoring productive rangelands: A comparative assessment of selective and non-selective chemical bush control in a semi-arid Kalahari savanna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemicals such as Tordon 225 and tebuthiuron have been successfully used, but the use of Tordon 225 is restricted by certain physiological and environmental conditions [30]. Concerns about tebuthiuron on the other hand pertain to the accumulation and persistence of the chemical in the soil thus posing potential threats to non-target species [36,37]. Biological methods sometimes employed include the controlled use of herbivores (especially goats) and fire.…”
Section: Combating Bush Encroachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemicals such as Tordon 225 and tebuthiuron have been successfully used, but the use of Tordon 225 is restricted by certain physiological and environmental conditions [30]. Concerns about tebuthiuron on the other hand pertain to the accumulation and persistence of the chemical in the soil thus posing potential threats to non-target species [36,37]. Biological methods sometimes employed include the controlled use of herbivores (especially goats) and fire.…”
Section: Combating Bush Encroachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years many pastoralists from countries in southern Africa started to apply a wide range of management practices to counteract shrub-encroachment, for example, prescribed fires, chemical or manual bush control, brush packing and reseeding of perennial grasses. It is still not clear which of these practices are successful under which farming system and environmental conditions (Harmse, Kellner, & Dreber, 2016;Throop & Archer, 2007;van den Berg & Kellner, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Bush control refers to past applications (minimum 6 years old) of a tebuthiuron‐based arboricide in areas, where the density of the woody layer most likely exceeded 1.000 tree equivalents per ha (1 TE = woody plant of 1.5 m). In untreated sites, an ongoing preventative range management maintained a moderate bush cover over time, whereas the combined effect of overgrazing and suppression of wildfires was the likely cause for the thickening of vegetation in the high‐bush cover sites (Harmse, Kellner & Dreber, ). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications for ecosystem functions are varied, whereas negative effects on key services such as forage production are among the most prevalent. Hence, active bush control is often applied by local commercial farmers to thin out the woody layer and restore the economic viability of their rangelands (Harmse, Kellner & Dreber, ). A positive ecological side effect of such measures can be the conservation of local biodiversity, whose overall status may otherwise significantly decline in response to compositional and structural changes of thickening woody vegetation (Archer & Predick, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%