1997
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1433:rotsac>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of the South African Cloud-Seeding Experiments Using Hygroscopic Flares

Abstract: A new method of seeding convective clouds for the purpose of augmenting rainfall is being developed in South Africa. Flares that produce small salt particles (0.5-m mean diameter) are attached to the trailing edge of the wings of seeding aircraft and ignited in updrafts below the cloud base of convective storms. This method of delivery overcomes most of the difficulties encountered in the handling and the use of hygroscopic materials, difficulties that made seeding with ice nuclei (AgI) a more attractive optio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the giant nuclei are 50 per litre for rain embryo activation versus less than 0.5 per litre for the simulations listed in Table I Although the number of giant nuclei is several orders of magnitude smaller than CCN, more raindrops are generated (Figure 14(c)) and consume water vapour during the activation stage, thus decreasing the supersaturation and reducing the chance for smaller aerosols to be activated into cloud drops (as shown in Figure 14(a)). This concept has been adopted in warm cloud seeding, where artificial giant nuclei not only promote coalescence but may also reduce cloud drops and cause those activated to grow bigger (Cooper et al, 1997;Mather et al, 1997). Also, in the study of Ghan et al (1998), the water vapour competition between large-size aerosols (sea salt) and small-size aerosols (sulfate) can decrease supersaturation and cloud drop number.…”
Section: Effects Of Giant Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the giant nuclei are 50 per litre for rain embryo activation versus less than 0.5 per litre for the simulations listed in Table I Although the number of giant nuclei is several orders of magnitude smaller than CCN, more raindrops are generated (Figure 14(c)) and consume water vapour during the activation stage, thus decreasing the supersaturation and reducing the chance for smaller aerosols to be activated into cloud drops (as shown in Figure 14(a)). This concept has been adopted in warm cloud seeding, where artificial giant nuclei not only promote coalescence but may also reduce cloud drops and cause those activated to grow bigger (Cooper et al, 1997;Mather et al, 1997). Also, in the study of Ghan et al (1998), the water vapour competition between large-size aerosols (sea salt) and small-size aerosols (sulfate) can decrease supersaturation and cloud drop number.…”
Section: Effects Of Giant Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions necessitate randomized comparisons of the seeded cloud with similar, nonseeded clouds (experiments duration 5-10 yr for crossover design) 2 with one experiment day as the experimental unit. P. Pioggia showed that even a high rain correlation factor of 0.68 between neighboring target and control areas did not guarantee sufficient meteorological similarity (List et al 1999 Seeding with single clouds as the experimental unit may be assessed within about 3-4 yr (Mather et al 1997). This method assumes that the cloud's neighbors, if far enough away, are not affected by the seeding and can be used for comparison.…”
Section: Randomized Experiments (The First Wmo Criterion)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of small amounts of giant cloud condensation nuclei (GCCN) to stratocumulus cloud may have little direct impact on radiative effects, but the impacts may be significant if the GCCN can initiate or enhance precipitation (Jensen and Lee, 2008). Nonetheless, the role of GCCN in precipitation production in stratocumulus clouds is less explored compared with the substantial work that has been done on other types of clouds (e.g., Takahashi, 1976;Johnson, 1982;Tzivion et al, 1994;Mather et al, 1997;Yin et al, 2000a, b;World Meteorological Organization, 2000;Levin et al, 2005;Rosenfeld et al, 2010). Therefore, our study focuses on the role of GCCN in stratocumulus clouds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%