“…The g-secretase subunits found in the ER/early secretory pathway most likely represent unassembled or partially assembled subcomplexes, but not the active enzyme. The evidence supporting such a model is manifold and, because of space constraints, only key arguments will be highlighted: (1) APP/C99/C83 are not cleaved by g-secretase in the ER (Cupers et al 2001;Maltese et al 2001;Grimm et al 2003;Kaether et al 2006b); (2) by immuno-electron microscopy, PS1 is not detected in Golgi or TGN but in ER and PM (Rechards et al 2003); whereas the ER pool most likely reflects unassembled PS1, the PM pool has assembled, active complex; (3) only the mature, glycosylated NCT, not immature unglycosylated NCT, is present in the fully assembled, active g-secretase complex Kaether et al 2002), and therefore g-secretase-associated NCTmust have passed the Golgi; (4) g-secretase has been shown by various methods, including cell surface biotinylation, binding of biotinylated inhibitors specific for the active complex, and microscopic techniques, to be present at the PM (Kaether et al 2002;Tarassishin et al 2004;Chyung et al 2005). It has been shown that the 1-cleavage of APP differs in endosomes and PM (Fukumori et al 2006), suggesting that g-secretase has different properties depending on its subcellular localization, maybe because of differences in pH or lipid composition.…”