Rethinking end-to-end congestion control in software-defined networks

Ghobadi, Monia; Yeganeh, Soheil Hassas; Ganjali, Yashar

doi:10.1145/2390231.2390242

Cited by 79 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, because PANE allows applications to reserve guaranteed bandwidth, such applications could skip TCP's slow start phase, or even allow for the network control-plane to be involved in setting congestion control and other parameters, as in proposals such as XCP [28] and OpenTCP [21]. PANE could also integrate better support for middlebox-based services, perhaps by integrating the approach advocated for by Gember, et al [20].…”

Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory networking

Ferguson

Guha

Place

et al. 2013

SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

So ware De ned Networks, which provide a programmable, logically centralized abstraction of network control, o er an escape from the current state of enterprise and datacenter network con guration, plagued by brittle, static solutions involving manual setting of myriad devices. But if SDNs provide an operating system for the network, we are missing the analog to system callsan API for end-users and their applications to take part in network con guration. In response, we propose participatory networking, a new paradigm for network con guration in which users submit requests or hints for current and future network properties such as quality of service, access control, and path selection. We describe the initial design and implementation of a participatory networking system, PANE, and its solutions to the challenges of resource arbitration and privilege delegation.

show abstract

Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory networking

Ferguson

Guha

Place

et al. 2013

SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Substantially, facing the challenges of SDN performance is following a mainstream pattern by deploying new solutions for classical issues. Many existing mechanisms can still be used in order to properly manage SDN performance such as quality of service , load balancing , end‐to‐end congestion control , and data traffic scheduling .…”

Section: Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Software‐defined networking (SDN): a survey

Benzekki

Fergougui

Elalaoui

2016

Security Comm Networks

282

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the advent of cloud computing, many new networking concepts have been introduced to simplify network management and bring innovation through network programmability. The emergence of the software-defined networking (SDN) paradigm is one of these adopted concepts in the cloud model so as to eliminate the network infrastructure maintenance processes and guarantee easy management. In this fashion, SDN offers real-time performance and responds to high availability requirements. However, this new emerging paradigm has been facing many technological hurdles; some of them are inherent, while others are inherited from existing adopted technologies. In this paper, our purpose is to shed light on SDN related issues and give insight into the challenges facing the future of this revolutionary network model, from both protocol and architecture perspectives. Additionally, we aim to present different existing solutions and mitigation techniques that address SDN scalability, elasticity, dependability, reliability, high availability, resiliency, security, and performance concerns.

show abstract

“…Ghobadi et al [14] proposed a TCP dynamic adjustment framework based on SDN-OpenTCP. OpenTCP is an SDN application deployed on an SDN controller using the global network view of SDNs and is established based on the good strategy mechanism with the forwarding nodes and modifying the terminal protocol stack to continue the dynamic adjustment with the terminal congestion mechanism to achieve optimization.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Software-Defined Congestion Control Algorithm for IP Networks

Peng

Zhang

2017

Scientific Programming

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rapid evolution of computer networks, increase in the number of Internet users, and popularity of multimedia applications have exacerbated the congestion control problem. Congestion control is a key factor in ensuring network stability and robustness. When the underlying network and flow information are unknown, the transmission control protocol (TCP) must increase or reduce the size of the congestion window to adjust to the changes of traffic in the Internet Protocol (IP) network. However, it is possible that a software-defined approach can relieve the network congestion problem more efficiently. This approach has the characteristic of centralized control and can obtain a global topology for unified network management. In this paper, we propose a software-defined congestion control (SDCC) algorithm for an IP network. We consider the difference between TCP and the user datagram protocol (UDP) and propose a new method to judge node congestion. We initially apply the congestion control mechanism in the congested nodes and then optimize the link utilization to control network congestion.

show abstract

Rethinking end-to-end congestion control in software-defined networks

Cited by 79 publications

References 26 publications

Participatory networking

Participatory networking

Software‐defined networking (SDN): a survey

Software-Defined Congestion Control Algorithm for IP Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About