2008
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcn047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reticulated platelets as a screening test to identify thrombocytopenia aetiology

Abstract: RP measurement by flow cytometry, directly from whole-blood, is a useful screening test to differentiate between thrombocytopenia with high or low thrombopoietic activity. A RP percentage in excess of 11%, has a high sensitivity and good specificity for a diagnosis of thrombocytopenia with increased thrombopoietic activity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
21
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We measured RP% using flow cytometry by a simple technique directly from whole-blood, avoiding extra manipulation, with a dual-labelling method for platelet identification. Monteagudo et al [24] who used the same protocol for measuring RP% as the one used in our study found that RP% value in excess of 11% had a high sensitivity and good specificity for a diagnosis of thrombocytopenia with increased thrombopoietic activity which reflected that RP% determination is a reliable platelet turnover marker. In the present study, the median RP% was significantly higher in thrombocytopenic versus non-thrombocytopenic patients (11.75% versus 2.72% respectively, P < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We measured RP% using flow cytometry by a simple technique directly from whole-blood, avoiding extra manipulation, with a dual-labelling method for platelet identification. Monteagudo et al [24] who used the same protocol for measuring RP% as the one used in our study found that RP% value in excess of 11% had a high sensitivity and good specificity for a diagnosis of thrombocytopenia with increased thrombopoietic activity which reflected that RP% determination is a reliable platelet turnover marker. In the present study, the median RP% was significantly higher in thrombocytopenic versus non-thrombocytopenic patients (11.75% versus 2.72% respectively, P < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, there is an evident lack of analytical standardization as there is a significant variability in the various published protocols regarding the incubation time, the used substrate (whole blood or platelet-rich plasma), concentrations of the fluorescent dyes, and the use of a second antibody marker to distinguish platelets, which yielded much variation in the published reference intervals of reticulated platelets percent (RP%) [19] . Even so, numerous studies have suggested that analysis of RP represents a valuable estimate of the rate of platelet production in bone marrow [17,19,[20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Furthermore, retPLTs are an early predictor of bone marrow recovery after chemotherapy and transplantation. 9 Therefore, a standardized and fully automated method would be desirable for routine use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy should be performed when the aetiology is unclear. Reticulated platelets or the equivalent immature platelet fraction can help in discriminating between thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow failure (low percentages) and hyperdestructive thrombocytopenia (high percentages) [7,8], although the specificity of these tests has not been validated prospectively. Limited evidence suggests that plasma glycocalicin and thrombopoietin levels can increase the specificity of reticulated platelets in thrombocytopenia due to increased platelet destruction [9].…”
Section: Type Mechanisms Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%