2022
DOI: 10.1177/15423050221090861
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: Analysis of the Generation Z's Viewpoint from the Faith-Based Educational Institutions on the Toxic Positivity Phenomena: How and Why?

Abstract: Toxic positivity is indicated by encouraging words spoken in difficult situations that force someone to feel good about themselves. It becomes a current issue around the Generation Z because of the realization that toxic positivity could have a negative impact on mental health and individual social relationships. This study aims to analyze the views of Generation Z on the phenomena of toxic positivity. The approach of this study was quantitative using descriptive methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has its own peculiarities because this research was conducted in Madura more precisely in the city of Pamekasan, so this research was conducted using Madurese culture more precisely in the city of Pamekasan. In addition, this research is one of the important topics to be raised as a continuation of several previous studies at Faith-Based Institutions (Amalia et al, 2022;Pangestu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This study has its own peculiarities because this research was conducted in Madura more precisely in the city of Pamekasan, so this research was conducted using Madurese culture more precisely in the city of Pamekasan. In addition, this research is one of the important topics to be raised as a continuation of several previous studies at Faith-Based Institutions (Amalia et al, 2022;Pangestu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…From the descriptions found in the initial literature search, authors specifically discussed toxic positivity as the conscious dismissal of another's expressed negative emotions (Collins, 2022;Cross, 2022;Goodman, 2022;Lecompte-Van Poucke, 2022;Pangestu et al, 2022;Riddell, 2020;Tufvesson, 2020;Upadhyay et al, 2022). These descriptions provided a foundation for subsequent dimensional exploration.…”
Section: Dimensions and Sub-dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the pressure to remain happy amidst challenging circumstances can diminish genuine happiness and encourage emotional suppression (Sinclair et al, 2020). Pangestu et al (2022) posit that toxic positivity creates an exaggerated mindset about happiness, which produces ineffective, sometimes detrimental results. For instance, inappropriately implemented positivity, whether internally or externally manifested, invalidates a person's experienced emotions as faulted or inferior (Cross, 2022;Goodman, 2022).…”
Section: Dimension: Disingenuous Happinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this description, the authors are interested in knowing the description of the level of Psychological Well-Being of prospective counselors from the Faith-Based Educational Institution during the COVID-19 Pandemic, as follow-up research from Pangestu et al (2022) . Students in this study were limited to the context of prospective counselors who came from this program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%