1989
DOI: 10.1080/07370658908012561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversal of particle size/shock sensitivity relationship at small particle size for pressed heterogeneous explosives under sustained shock loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For sustained shocks, it is found that, at constant material density, the smaller particles are more sensitive than larger under SDT conditions down to minimum size when the sensitivity decreases again. An investigation of RDX powder at 90% of TMD showed that in order of sensitivity 21 μm powder was more sensitive than 100, 138 and 250 μm, but that 3.9 μm powder was slightly less sensitive than 21 μm [36]. As noted before, this is probably a result of the efficacy of the hot spot forming imperfections being related to the particle size of the pressed powder.…”
Section: (B) the Sdt Processmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For sustained shocks, it is found that, at constant material density, the smaller particles are more sensitive than larger under SDT conditions down to minimum size when the sensitivity decreases again. An investigation of RDX powder at 90% of TMD showed that in order of sensitivity 21 μm powder was more sensitive than 100, 138 and 250 μm, but that 3.9 μm powder was slightly less sensitive than 21 μm [36]. As noted before, this is probably a result of the efficacy of the hot spot forming imperfections being related to the particle size of the pressed powder.…”
Section: (B) the Sdt Processmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The non-monotonic sensitivity with median micrograin size of 10%-porous RDX was also shown. 74 This non-monotonic behavior was theoretically conrmed for HMX, TATB and TNT. 75 At a given porosity, the voids must be sufficiently small, depending on the considered explosive, for the sensitivity to decrease and ignition to eventually fail.…”
Section: B Experimental Uncertainty and Factors Affecting The Relatio...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is well known that the specific interfacial area is an important parameter determining the ignition behavior of PBXs. 38,39 To properly delineate the statistical trends in behavior, more systematically constructed microstructure sample sets must be developed.…”
Section: Quantification and Effects Of Variations Of Microstructurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar effect was also observed in pressed RDX by Spear and Nanut. 39 Khasainov et al 38 suggested that this shock sensitivity reversal in PBXs is due to a change in critical hotspot size resulting from differences in the specific interface area of the granules. The dependence of ignition sensitivity on input stress is a complex issue which involves two aspects: (1) the formation of critical hotspots and (2) the propagation of reaction in hotspots and associated thermal runaway.…”
Section: K Axial Stress and Median Time To Criticality T 50mentioning
confidence: 99%