1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(99)00766-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separation of complex samples by optimizing temperature and gradient time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage error between experimental and calculated from Eqs. (11) and (12) The oven temperature was estimated from Eq. (7) using data of Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentage error between experimental and calculated from Eqs. (11) and (12) The oven temperature was estimated from Eq. (7) using data of Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the simulation was described using two parameters [35]. One is the error du in the volume-fraction of the strong solvent u for the predicted separation, as calculated from Eq.…”
Section: Binary Mobile Phase Screening and Computation Of Isoeluotropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gradient run induced a peak focusing effect coinciding with lower retention time, resulting in sharper peak shapes and less tailing. To measure this effect quantifiably, the average peak capacity was measured of the isothermal runs and the gradient run as described in literature [45][46][47]. A peak capacity of 55 was obtained for the gradient run (time interval of 20 min), while the peak capacities of the isothermal runs at 25, 40 and 60°C were 50, 54 and 38, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%