Reversible intercalation and exfoliation of layered covalent triazine frameworks for enhanced lithium ion storage

Zhu, Yuanzhi; Chen, Xifan; Cao, Yaqi; Peng, Wenchao; Li, Yang; Zhang, Guoliang; Zhang, Fengbao

doi:10.1039/c8cc10262g

Cited by 82 publications

(67 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The building blocks of Tz, Th, and BT have been employed to produce many porous polymer anodes for LIBs owing to their high n‐type doping/dedoping abilities, such as the Tz‐containing polymers PAT‐COF, E‐SNW‐1/CNT, and f ‐CTF‐1, the Th‐containing polymers P33DT, PTTE, DBD‐CMP2, and TThPP, and the BT‐containing polymer PDCzBT . However, all of these polymers only contain one of the three building blocks.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploiting Polythiophenyl‐Triazine‐Based Conjugated Microporous Polymer with Superior Lithium‐Storage Performance

Ren

Zhang

et al. 2020

ChemSusChem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs) have been heralded as promising energy‐storage materials with advantages such as chemical flexibility, porous structure, and environmentally friendliness. Herein, a novel conjugated microporous polymer was synthesized by integrating triazine, thiophene, and benzothiadiazole into a polymer skeleton, and the Li+‐storage performance for the as‐synthesized polymer anode in Li‐ion batteries (LIBs) was investigated. Benefiting from the inherent large surface area, plentiful redox‐active units, and hierarchical porous structure, the polymer anode delivered a high Li+ storage capacity up to 1599 mAh g−1 at a current rate of 50 mA g−1 with an excellent rate behavior (363 mAh g−1 at 5 A g−1) and a long‐term cyclability of 326 mAh g−1 over 1500 cycles at 5 A g−1, implying that the newly developed polymer anode offers a great prospect for next‐generation LIBs.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploiting Polythiophenyl‐Triazine‐Based Conjugated Microporous Polymer with Superior Lithium‐Storage Performance

Ren

Zhang

et al. 2020

ChemSusChem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given that the conventional redox‐driven intercalation method will bring an unavoidable damage, Fan and co‐workers reported a new approach to prepare single‐layered and few‐layered CTF‐1 based on acid‐base‐driven intercalation reaction and subsequent oxidation exfoliation. [ 81 ] The electron‐donating property of networks is favorable to the acid intercalation. Therefore, the layered CTF‐1 allows a reversible intercalation of either oxidizing or nonoxidizing acid.…”

Section: Strategies To Improve the Performances Of Cofs Electrodementioning

confidence: 99%

Covalent–Organic Frameworks: Advanced Organic Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Batteries

Sun

Xie

Guo

et al. 2020

Advanced Energy Materials

506

329

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

energy-storage systems with high specific energy, long lifespan, and excellent safety. [5][6][7] Among them, the rechargeable secondary batteries have been demonstrated as the most promising candidate for electricity storage and utilization. [8][9][10][11] As one of the most popular batteries, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have found immense success in consumer electronics and electric vehicles, and are under the consideration for energy-storage power stations. [12][13][14] However, the commercial LIBs based on transition metal-based inorganic compounds have encountered a bottleneck. [15][16][17] The charge storage of inorganic electrode materials is governed by the oxidation-state variation of transition metal centers and achieved a charge balance with the insertion of counterions. [18] Restricted by crystal lattice and structure stability, the size and valence of counterions are required to match the crystal structures, which severely limit further improvement of energy density. [19][20][21] Clearly, these factors intrinsically weaken the versatility of inorganic materials. For instance, the similar electrode materials, which are successful in LIBs, are not suitable for other alkali ions batteries. [22][23][24] Additionally, from the viewpoint of economical and renewable factors of mineral resources, the existing LIBs based on transition metals (e.g., cobalt, nickel, and manganese) are difficult to meet the requirement of large-scale energy storage. [25] Nowadays, various demands have been raised up for the state-ofthe-art batteries, not only in the enhancement of cycle life, fast charging, and safety, but also in the focus of cost, lightweight, pollution-free, and environmental benign. [26,27] Under this background, researchers gradually shift their studies on novel batteries system and electrode materials. [28][29][30][31] Among them, explorations on the possibility of using organic compounds as potential alternatives of current inorganic electrode materials have never been stopped. [32,33,66] Organics have been demonstrated as promising electrode candidates due to their variety, sustainability, relatively low cost, and environmental friendliness. [34][35][36] The structural diversity implies that the richness of organic materials will provide abundant options and room in this field. The molecule engineering means that the electrochemical properties of organic electrodes can be rationally tuned with different functional groups, which exhibits a good designability of organic materials. These important features allow various designable synthetic routes and convenient functionalization. Although organic electrode materials are endowed with many advantages, their development and Covalent-organic frameworks (COFs), featuring structural diversity, framework tunability and functional versatility, have emerged as promising organic electrode materials for rechargeable batteries and garnered tremendous attention in recent years. The adjustable pore configuration, coupled with the functionalization of frameworks through ...

show abstract

“…D TP -A NDI -COF@CNTs [62] LIBs cathode 67/200 100 %/200/700 58 /1000 Tp-DNAT-COF [63] LIBs cathode 123/50 71 %/50/100 66 /2000 Tb-DNAT-COF [63] LIBs cathode 144/50 74 %/500/300 66 /2000 DAAQ-TFP-ECOF [48] LIBs cathode 145/20 98 %/500/1800 76 /3000 DABQ-TFP-ECOF [48] LIBs cathode 210/20 97 %/20/20 / TEMPO-ECOF [48] LIBs cathode 115/20 90 %/20/3 / NT-COF [115] LIBs cathode 124/100 81 %/100/100 / PIBN-G [68] LIBs cathode 271/28 86 %/280/300 193/2800 PPDOTB-COF [67] LIBs cathode 198/20 68 %/20/150 98 /1500 2D-PAI@CNT [66] LIBs cathode 104/100 100 %/500/8000 95 /2000 PI-ECOF/rGO30 [65] LIBs cathode 127/14.2 82 %/142/300 60 /1420 BQ1-COF [58] LIBs cathode 502/38 81 %/1540/1000 170 /7730 PGF-1 [69] LIBs cathode 842/100 78 %/500/1400 189/5000 DAPH-TFP COF [110] LIBs cathode 81.7/85 / 49/3420 PEDOT@DAPH-TFP [110] LIBs cathode 93.2/85 / 47/3420 TThPP [70] LIBs anode 666/200 61 %/1000/200 195/4000 N 2 -COF [71] LIBs anode 735/1000 82 %/1000/500 497/5000 N 3 -COF [71] LIBs anode 731/1000 81 %/1000/500 / NPCs [73] LIBs anode 488/100 -/5000/5000 102/5000 Cz-COF1 [78] LIBs anode 628/100 236 mAh g À 1 /200/400 -/1000 IISERP-CON1 [79] LIBs anode 720/100 98 %/500/1000 460/2000 E-TFPB-COF/MnO 2 [46] LIBs anode 2423/100 100 %/100/300 / COF@CNTs [72] LIBs anode 928/100 1021 mAh g À 1 /100/500 / NBC [74] LIBs anode 379/100 100 %/10000/5000 184.4/5000 IISERP-CON2 [80] LIBs anode 220/100 92 %/100/200 171/1000 E-CIN-1/CNT [49] LIBs anode 1269/520 687 mAh g À 1 /100/250 97/5000 E-SNW-1/CNT [49] LIBs anode 1470/761 744 mAh g À 1 /100/250 212/5000 f-CTF-1 [47] LIBs anode 816/100 70 %/1000/500 186/10000 PA-COF [76] LIBs anode 535/200 74 %/1000/2000 141/5000 TB-COF [76] LIBs anode 442/200 72 %/1000/2000 144/5000 JUC-526 [75] LIBs anode 750/50 100 % /100/500 441/200 E-FCTF [108] LIBs anode 871/100 5...…”

Section: P E R S O N a L A C C O U N T T H E C H E M I C A L R E C O R Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Copyright (2019) Wiley). Illustration of the preparation process of f-CTF-1 nanosheets (J) (reprinted with permission from ref [47]. Copyright (2019) The Royal Society of Chemistry).…”

Section: P E R S O N a L A C C O U N T T H E C H E M I C A L R E C O R Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It will inevitably lead to reduced capacity, poor cycling stability and low rate performance. [46][47][48][49] Though there are many reviews focused on different types of organic materials as electrodes in MIBs, [50][51][52][53][54] few reviews are related to the usage of COFs in metal-ion batteries. [55][56][57] Herein, we present recent progress in COFs for application in metal-ion batteries, especially for LIBs and Na-ion batteries (SIBs).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Covalent Organic Frameworks as Electrode Materials for Metal Ion Batteries: A Current Review

Wang

Jin

Huang

et al. 2020

The Chemical Record

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the world moves toward electromobility, our daily lives are flooded with variety of lithium ion batteries (LIBs), and the concerns of cost, safety and environmental friendliness of LIBs spring up in the minds of scientists. Although organic electrodes have been considered as promising alternatives to their inorganic counterparts, some intrinsic weaknesses still plague scientists, such as high solubility, low conductivity and sluggish ion diffusion. The emergence of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) attracts our attention because of their robust networks and open pores that could facilitate the infiltration of electrolyte ions when used as electrodes for metal-ion batteries (MIBs). In this review, we summarized the recent progress of COFs as electrode materials, and the strategies toward enhancing electrochemical performance of COFbased electrode in MIBs are discussed. Hopefully, this review will provide a fundamental guidance for future development of COF-based electrodes.

show abstract

Reversible intercalation and exfoliation of layered covalent triazine frameworks for enhanced lithium ion storage

Abstract: Layered covalent triazine frameworks can be exfoliated into 1–2 layered nanosheets via acid–base intercalation and subsequent oxidation exfoliation to obtain much improved specific capacitance and rate performance for Li ion battery anode.

Cited by 82 publications

References 43 publications

Exploiting Polythiophenyl‐Triazine‐Based Conjugated Microporous Polymer with Superior Lithium‐Storage Performance

Exploiting Polythiophenyl‐Triazine‐Based Conjugated Microporous Polymer with Superior Lithium‐Storage Performance

Covalent–Organic Frameworks: Advanced Organic Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Batteries

Covalent Organic Frameworks as Electrode Materials for Metal Ion Batteries: A Current Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About