2019
DOI: 10.31233/osf.io/cpgqk
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review and test of reproducibility of subdecadal resolution palaeoenvironmental reconstructions from microfossil assemblages

Abstract: Very high, even annual, resolution quantitative palaeoenvironmental reconstructions have been generated from microfossil assemblage data using transferfunctions. Evidence of the utility of some of these reconstructions is given by thehigh correlations between the reconstructions and instrumental records. Suchperformance is despite several ecological and taphonomic issues that can becomemore problematic at sub-decadal resolution than at multidecadal resolution. Thispaper explores these timescale dependent issue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two approaches are referred to as "calibration in time" and "calibration in space, " respectively. Uncertainties reported for paleotemperatures based on calibration-in-time procedures are typically relatively small because the method is tuned to reconstruct temperature variability at a single site, although this characterization does not represent all potential uncertainties 577 . In contrast, uncertainties typically reported for calibration-in-space procedures are usually characterized by larger but more globally applicable uncertainties, as the proxy-environment relation is examined over a wide environmental gradient.…”
Section: Usage Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two approaches are referred to as "calibration in time" and "calibration in space, " respectively. Uncertainties reported for paleotemperatures based on calibration-in-time procedures are typically relatively small because the method is tuned to reconstruct temperature variability at a single site, although this characterization does not represent all potential uncertainties 577 . In contrast, uncertainties typically reported for calibration-in-space procedures are usually characterized by larger but more globally applicable uncertainties, as the proxy-environment relation is examined over a wide environmental gradient.…”
Section: Usage Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer function was then applied to a short core collected from Indico. The significance of the transfer function reconstruction was tested using the ‘randomTF’ function in palaeoSig (Telford, ). The reconstruction results were validated against plant macrofossil data from the same core, and plant macrofossil‐based WTD reconstruction was also processed for easily visible comparison based on Väliranta et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We also test the reliability of the transfer functions applied to oceanic pollen assemblages by reconstructing the climate conditions from 24 oceanic surface sediment samples (these oceanic samples were previously removed from the 183‐sample modern pollen–climate training set before to perform this test). We further check the extent to which calibration may be affected by spatial autocorrelation using the R package PALAEOSIG (Telford, ). Finally, we apply the models to two oceanic pollen records: core MD07‐3104 located at 41°S in Reloncaví Fjord and core MD07‐3088 located at 46°S offshore Taitao Peninsula (Montade et al , , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%