2009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1224777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Bone Substitutes

Abstract: Bone substitutes are being increasingly used in craniofacial surgery and craniomaxillofacial trauma. We will review the history of the biomaterials and describe the ideal characteristics of bone substitutes, with a specific emphasis on craniofacial reconstruction. Some of the most commonly used bone substitutes are discussed in more depth, such as calcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite ceramics and cements, bioactive glass, and polymer products. Areas of active research and future directions include tissue engin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as 45S5 Bioglass ® is concerned, the toxicology and biocompatibility studies to establish its safety for FDA clearance date back to 1981 and the first medical product (i.e., Bioglass Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis) was indeed cleared by FDA via the 510(k) process as early as 1985 . Various products derived from 45S5 Bioglass ® and alternative glass formulations are now diffuse in the market . In 2005, for the first time, the FDA approved a new product (Novabone ® ), which also includes sol–gel‐derived particles having the 58S composition .…”
Section: β‐Tcp/bioglass Composites: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as 45S5 Bioglass ® is concerned, the toxicology and biocompatibility studies to establish its safety for FDA clearance date back to 1981 and the first medical product (i.e., Bioglass Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis) was indeed cleared by FDA via the 510(k) process as early as 1985 . Various products derived from 45S5 Bioglass ® and alternative glass formulations are now diffuse in the market . In 2005, for the first time, the FDA approved a new product (Novabone ® ), which also includes sol–gel‐derived particles having the 58S composition .…”
Section: β‐Tcp/bioglass Composites: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B) of various biological or synthetic substances can infiltrate large defects [18, 88]. Autologous bone derived from a patient’s own body represents the gold standard material.…”
Section: Wound Repair Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its low availability and invasiveness of the extraction surgery prompt a critical need for other alternatives. Allogeneic bone and its demineralized form have been suggested as substitutes for autografts to improve tissue reconstruction in craniofacial defects and fractured gaps [8890], but supply limitations remain. Consequently, synthetic alternatives, such as calcium phosphates [89, 91] and calcium sulfates have been widely incorporated into bone fillers [18].…”
Section: Wound Repair Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interconnected porous structure is attractive for bone substitutes because bone tissue and cells can penetrate the bone substitute . Furthermore, microporous structure should play an important role in cell growth and differentiation, similar to the niche environment or microenvironment produced by the extracellular matrix .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%