Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2312948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of high-contrast imaging systems for current and future ground- and space-based telescopes I: coronagraph design methods and optical performance metrics

Abstract: The Optimal Optical Coronagraph (OOC) Workshop at the Lorentz Center in September 2017 in Leiden, the Netherlands gathered a diverse group of 25 researchers working on exoplanet instrumentation to stimulate the emergence and sharing of new ideas. In this first installment of a series of three papers summarizing the outcomes of the OOC workshop, we present an overview of design methods and optical performance metrics developed for coronagraph instruments. The design and optimization of coronagraphs for future t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
(105 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the limiting case where stellar photon noise originating from quasistatic aberrations is dominating (e.g., HR8799's planet infrared spectroscopy with KPIC), the corresponding exposure time gain is τ ∝ η s ∕η 2 p (see Ref. 29), where η s and η p are the fraction of residual star and detected planet light, respectively. The achieved stellar signal suppression of ∼100 shown in this paper would translate into a reduction of ∼100 in necessary exposure time.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the limiting case where stellar photon noise originating from quasistatic aberrations is dominating (e.g., HR8799's planet infrared spectroscopy with KPIC), the corresponding exposure time gain is τ ∝ η s ∕η 2 p (see Ref. 29), where η s and η p are the fraction of residual star and detected planet light, respectively. The achieved stellar signal suppression of ∼100 shown in this paper would translate into a reduction of ∼100 in necessary exposure time.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E Q -T A R G E T ; t e m p : i n t r a l i n k -; e 0 1 3 ; 1 1 6 ; 6 6 6 FTfEðx; yÞg ¼ 1 λf ZZ Eðx; yÞe −ikðxξþyηÞ∕f dx dy; (13) k ¼ 2π∕λ, λ is the wavelength, f is the focal length, and Lðx; yÞ is the LS function. Here the LS is a simple circular aperture that is undersized with respect to the geometric beam.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw contrast at a given position is defined as the ratio between the intensity due to an on-axis source (the star) and an equivalent source at that position. 13 The normalized intensityÎðξ; ηÞ is divided by the intensity of an off-axis source at a representative position in the image. In the following, we assume that the DM is nominally in the state that creates a dark hole in the image, which minimizes the normalized intensity.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…low-order aberrations, 47 they will have a relaxed h req (e.g., by a factor of >10× for vortex coronagraphs 5 ) and the wavefront correction may be updated at correspondingly faster rates.…”
Section: Photon-noise-limited Performancementioning
confidence: 99%