2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of nanomaterials as sorbents in solid-phase extraction for environmental samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The availability of pure and fresh water is influenced by many factors including the high rate of population growth. It is estimated that approximately 2.7 billion people in numerous countries face scarcity of clean water [18,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of pure and fresh water is influenced by many factors including the high rate of population growth. It is estimated that approximately 2.7 billion people in numerous countries face scarcity of clean water [18,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZrO 2 . Zirconium (IV) oxide is used as the catalyst (due to the greater number of acidic centers on the surface) in the monoclinic modification [163], as the carrier for catalysts (due to the high thermal stability) in the tetragonal modification [164], and as the sorbent in the amorphous phase or at a low degree of crystallinity [165,166].…”
Section: Journal Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most unusual and promising properties of zirconium (IV) oxide particles is their sorption capacity both to anions and cations, which allows considering nanosized ZrO 2 and materials based on them as instruments for improving the ecological state of the environment. In this case, the hydrated zirconium (IV) oxide that is in the amorphous state has the highest sorption capacity [165,166]. The specificity of ZrO 2 usage as the sorbent is that it has high selectivity to polyvalent anions (chromates, borates, sulfates, phosphates, arsenates, etc.)…”
Section: Journal Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to extract target analytes from large sample volumes or difficult-to-handle samples, magnetic solid phase extraction (MSPE) employing magnetically responsive adsorbents was developed by Safarikova and Safarik in 1999. This approach has several advantages over traditional solid phase extraction performed in cartridges, namely: (a) it provides a rapid and simple analyte separation that avoids the need for centrifugation or filtration steps, (b) it avoids time-consuming and tedious on-column SPE procedures, (c) MSPE can also be used for samples containing suspended solids, (d) the magnetically responsive adsorbents may have high selectivity, even when complex biological and environmental samples are analyzed, (e) minimal amount of organic solvents for elution is necessary, (f) since the majority of sample impurities are diamagnetic, they do not interfere with magnetic particles during the magnetic separation step, and (g) automation of the whole process is possible, which leads to rapid, selective, sensitive, and repeatable methods for routine analyte determinations (Safarik & Safarikova 2012;Azzouz et al 2018). The scheme of MSPE is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Magnetic Solid Phase Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%