2007
DOI: 10.1080/17439880701511040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
143
1
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
143
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Enormous amounts of money have been spent on schools, particularly in the UK, so that IWBs could be installed (Higgins, Beauchamp, & Miller, 2007) aiming to support more interactive teaching delivery (Smith, Higgins, Wall, & Miller, 2005) and raise attainment in core subjects (Beauchamp, 2004). It is critical though to refer to IWB's potential to enhance interactivity across two distinct levels: technologically oriented and pedagogically oriented change.…”
Section: Teaching and Learning With An Interactive Whiteboardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enormous amounts of money have been spent on schools, particularly in the UK, so that IWBs could be installed (Higgins, Beauchamp, & Miller, 2007) aiming to support more interactive teaching delivery (Smith, Higgins, Wall, & Miller, 2005) and raise attainment in core subjects (Beauchamp, 2004). It is critical though to refer to IWB's potential to enhance interactivity across two distinct levels: technologically oriented and pedagogically oriented change.…”
Section: Teaching and Learning With An Interactive Whiteboardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the findings lead to only two solid conclusions: greater student motivationwhich diminishes with time-(see Higgins et al, 2007), and better presentations of theoretical content by teachers-albeit using a lecture-style approach (see Littleton, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework What Does the Research Say About The Imentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Overall, these studies and meta-analyses mentioned two potential benefits of the IWB: better presentation of certain theoretical content using multisensorial techniques (Saltan et al, 2009), but at the same time using a lecture-style approach (see Littleton, 2010); and higher student interest, at least in the short term (see Balta & Duran, 2015;DiGregorio & Sobel-Lojeski, 2010;Wall et al, 2005). Greater student motivation (see also Higgins et al, 2007Higgins et al, , 2010Hall & Higgins, 2005) was the most frequent finding across the studies, although appetite for the IWB appears to wane over time (see Balta & Duran, 2015;Dostal, 2011;Türel, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework What Does the Research Say About The Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many of the early studies were "descriptive," "small scale," and reflective of the "enthusiasm of the 'initial innovator' or 'early adopter'" [12, p. 214]. Reported benefits were often not specific to the IWB, and could have been achieved using more traditional technology [12]. The more innovative features -the interactive features that set it apart from a traditional whiteboard described earlier -were often those that were least utilized.…”
Section: B More Recent Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%