Revision and academic impact: A case study of bioRxiv preprint papers

Peng, Wen; Yue, Mingliang; Sun, Mingyue; Ma, Tingcan

doi:10.1016/j.joi.2023.101484

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These include feedback from the community, additional data that is generated before submitting to the journal, and later changes after peer review. In the past, studies have used bioRxiv to analyze the revision process, showing the temporal distribution of revisions, as well as the relative relation between revisions and eventual academic impact (Peng et al, 2024). Yet, the exercise of reviewing the manuscripts can additionally be utilized in the laboratory and classroom, allowing students to identify how manuscripts change from an early draft to a final publication.…”

Section: Revision Of Manuscriptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reimagining bioRxiv and preprint servers as platforms for academic learning

Benjamin,

Wanjalla,

Gaddy

et al. 2024

Journal Cellular Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A popular preprint server, bioRxiv, is important as a tool for increased visibility for life science research. If used properly, however, bioRxiv can also be an important tool for training, as it may expose trainees (degree‐seeking students undertaking research or internships directly related to their field of study) to the peer review process. Here, we offer a comprehensive guide to using bioRxiv as a training tool, as well as offer suggestions for improvements in bioRxiv, including confusion that may be caused by bioRxiv articles appearing on PubMed.

show abstract

Section: Revision Of Manuscriptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reimagining bioRxiv and preprint servers as platforms for academic learning

Benjamin,

Wanjalla,

Gaddy

et al. 2024

Journal Cellular Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this article, Benjamin et al (2024) summaries (Callaway, 2023;Peng et al, 2024), but this novel idea conceptualizes peer review platforms as an avenue for mentorship. This may potentially be utilized in conjunction with the measurement of quotients to track student progress and quantitatively evaluate the utility of this form of mentorship (Neikirk, Barongan, Rolle, et al, 2023;Tian & Fan, 2014;Venkatesh & Shivaranjani, 2016).…”

Section: Innovative Ways To Increase Inclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to increase diversity in science under troubling times

Hinton,

Vue,

Marshall

2024

Journal Cellular Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a time where diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) has become a dog-whistle in some states and a negative attribute (Figure 1), there are still clear deficiencies in the retaining and training of underrepresented individuals, on a wide range of bases beyond only their race . To overcome these barriers, the field has recognized that a broader shift must occur in the field, which includes the prioritization of mentorship, leadership, and career development to promote the training of all individuals. Thus, this special edition highlighted that increasing diversity in science is about the creation of collaborative and supportive networks. Building inclusive communities that provide mentorship, resources, and opportunities for underrepresented groups is vital for their success and retention in the scientific field. This importance of mentorship, leadership, and career development has been exemplified by recent publications that contextualize and propose new forms of mentorship, including multi-mentoring systems and intentional mentoring (

show abstract

Revision and academic impact: A case study of bioRxiv preprint papers

Cited by 2 publications

References 44 publications

Reimagining bioRxiv and preprint servers as platforms for academic learning

Reimagining bioRxiv and preprint servers as platforms for academic learning

How to increase diversity in science under troubling times

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About