“…Scholars have identified rhetorical styles that range across private, public, and professional spheres: feminine, realist, courtly, bureaucratic, republican, and radical, for examples (Campbell, 1989;Darsey, 1999;Hariman, 1995). Each theorist makes visible terministic screens (Burke, 1969), or webs of concepts and attitudes-ways of knowing, doing, and being (Benson, 1974(Benson, , 1989) that construct knowledge and arrange power relationships. The project of CID is to identify disciplinary styles (or, in CID language, genres) of communication, coherent repertoires of symbolic practices that are constitutive of academic disciplines-an art history style, for example, or an engineering style.…”