2019
DOI: 10.1080/1057610x.2019.1615256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis

Abstract: Análisis del discursoen torno a los diálogos de paz 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The ethos of conflict is justifying belief that society develops in a violent conflict, to adapt to hostile conditions. When the conflict is of long duration and intensity, as in the Colombian case, an ethos is configured as a transversal axis of social life (Barreto-Galeano et al, 2019; Bar-Tal, 1998, 2000) that allows them to survive in the midst of highly stressful conditions (Bar-Tal, 2000; Lavi et al, 2014). Some beliefs contained in the ethos of the conflict are as follows: (a) justification of goals of the endo-group; (b) personal security and national survival; (c) delegitimization and dehumanization of opponents; (d) positive collective self-esteem with an ethnocentric tendency; (e) victimization of the endo-group that presents itself as the victim of the conflict; (f) patriotism that reflects attachment to the country through loyalty, care, and sacrifice; (g) unity focused on joining forces in the face of an external threat; and (h) peace as the ultimate goal of society (Bar-Tal, 2000, 2007, 2013; Bar-Tal et al, 2012).…”
Section: Intractable Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethos of conflict is justifying belief that society develops in a violent conflict, to adapt to hostile conditions. When the conflict is of long duration and intensity, as in the Colombian case, an ethos is configured as a transversal axis of social life (Barreto-Galeano et al, 2019; Bar-Tal, 1998, 2000) that allows them to survive in the midst of highly stressful conditions (Bar-Tal, 2000; Lavi et al, 2014). Some beliefs contained in the ethos of the conflict are as follows: (a) justification of goals of the endo-group; (b) personal security and national survival; (c) delegitimization and dehumanization of opponents; (d) positive collective self-esteem with an ethnocentric tendency; (e) victimization of the endo-group that presents itself as the victim of the conflict; (f) patriotism that reflects attachment to the country through loyalty, care, and sacrifice; (g) unity focused on joining forces in the face of an external threat; and (h) peace as the ultimate goal of society (Bar-Tal, 2000, 2007, 2013; Bar-Tal et al, 2012).…”
Section: Intractable Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, political communication on Twitter has been used to make normative claims that justify politicians' ideological positions (Jakob, 2020); and to undermine institutional trust through the use of derogatory language toward the media and political opponents in Trump's political campaign (Ross and Rivers, 2018). Similarly, authoritarian regimes use social media to discredit the opposition in Azerbaijan (Pearce, 2015), for glorifying politicians in power and denigrating their adversaries in Pakistan (Masroor et al, 2019), and for delegitimizing political adversaries and gaining support of military interventions in Colombia (Barreto-Galeano et al, 2019).…”
Section: Political Discourse Social Media and Ideologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizando el modelo de Barreto-Galeano et al (2019), se clasificaron los actores en diferentes niveles, identificando cuatro niveles diferentes (véase Tabla 1). En el primer nivel encontramos a la sociedad (56.06%), donde se ubican principalmente ciudadanos y organizaciones privadas (relacionadas con la educación y la salud).…”
Section: Descripción De Usuarios De La Red De Difusiónunclassified