2016
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and efficacy of human‐enabled interspecific hybridization for climate‐change adaptation: response to Hamilton and Miller (2016)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we think this is a fruitful field for further research, given (a) the accumulating evidence for adaptation through aneuploidy (Selmecki et al, ; Yona et al, ), (b) the evidence that hybrid meiosis leads to high rates of aneuploidy in yeast (Rogers et al, ), and (c) the circumstance that both aneuploidy and hybridisation occur in stressful and perturbed habitats (Garroway et al, ; Muhlfeld et al, ). Whether hybridisation will generally assist or hamper adaptation to changing environments, with or without aneuploidy, is itself a debated topic (Hamilton & Miller, ; Kovach, Luikart, Lowe, Boyer, & Muhlfeld, ; Miller & Hamilton, ). In pathogenic microbes, this has particular relevance due to the medical risk of new hybrid pathogens emerging through genetic exchange with potentially increased virulence, larger host ranges, or increased drug resistance (Ochman, Lawrence, & Groisman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we think this is a fruitful field for further research, given (a) the accumulating evidence for adaptation through aneuploidy (Selmecki et al, ; Yona et al, ), (b) the evidence that hybrid meiosis leads to high rates of aneuploidy in yeast (Rogers et al, ), and (c) the circumstance that both aneuploidy and hybridisation occur in stressful and perturbed habitats (Garroway et al, ; Muhlfeld et al, ). Whether hybridisation will generally assist or hamper adaptation to changing environments, with or without aneuploidy, is itself a debated topic (Hamilton & Miller, ; Kovach, Luikart, Lowe, Boyer, & Muhlfeld, ; Miller & Hamilton, ). In pathogenic microbes, this has particular relevance due to the medical risk of new hybrid pathogens emerging through genetic exchange with potentially increased virulence, larger host ranges, or increased drug resistance (Ochman, Lawrence, & Groisman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether hybridisation will generally assist or hamper adaptation to changing environments, with or without aneuploidy, is itself a debated topic Kovach, Luikart, Lowe, Boyer, & Muhlfeld, 2016;. In pathogenic microbes, this has particular relevance due to the medical risk of new hybrid pathogens emerging through genetic exchange with potentially increased virulence, larger host ranges, or increased drug resistance (Ochman, Lawrence, & Groisman, 2000).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the adaptability of the species would demand the careful consideration of novel but controversial genetic restoration approaches such as facilitated adaptation, genome editing, or assisted adaptive introgression [56, 57]. Although the evidence for recent natural introgression could encourage the use of Eurasian lynx as a source for the latter, such drastic measure should require the careful evaluation of hybrid fitness and the associated risks of maladaptation and hybrid swarm [58]. In any case, existing examples of species with long-term persistence and widespread distribution despite depleted genetic diversity [59] allow for some measure of hope and argue for the maintenance of current conservation efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons for this is that maintenance of species’ evolutionary potential via genetic rescue may have opposing effects in species of conservation concern (Kovach, Luikart, Lowe, Boyer, & Muhlfeld, 2016; Miller & Hamilton, 2016). On the one hand, the introduction of novel variation may limit demographic and genetic consequences of limited population size, providing the necessary variation to adapt to changing conditions (Carlson et al., 2014; Hufbauer et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%