2019
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk balancing through selective use of social and physical information: a case study in the humbug damselfish

Abstract: To effectively balance the need to forage against the need to avoid predation, animals should utilize information from both their physical and social environments. However, most studies have considered these factors in isolation and few have investigated how animals change the use of these cues temporally. Using novel 3D modeling of the environment and 3D observations of fish movement, we investigated how local abiotic and biotic features of the environment, along with tidal patterns, impacted risk‐related beh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger fish generally ranked higher and foraged farther up-current than smaller individuals, capturing more zooplankton (Webster and Hixon 2000) and higher proportions of larger prey (Coates 1980;Forrester 1991). By investigating the proportion of fish outside the coral, zooplanktivorous fish were found to balance risk by utilizing environmental and social cues (Hansen et al 2016a;Kent et al 2019). Due to technical limitations, none of those studies relied on long-term, high-resolution, 3D tracking of marked individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger fish generally ranked higher and foraged farther up-current than smaller individuals, capturing more zooplankton (Webster and Hixon 2000) and higher proportions of larger prey (Coates 1980;Forrester 1991). By investigating the proportion of fish outside the coral, zooplanktivorous fish were found to balance risk by utilizing environmental and social cues (Hansen et al 2016a;Kent et al 2019). Due to technical limitations, none of those studies relied on long-term, high-resolution, 3D tracking of marked individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring a potential new food source can provide obvious foraging benefits but may expose an individual to potential risk from predation or noxious substances (Lima and Dill 1990). The social environment Communicated by I. Hamilton can play a large role in an individual's motivation to engage with novelty and subsequent learning opportunities (Boogert et al 2006;Mirville et al 2016;Langley et al 2018;Kent et al 2019;Hansen et al 2020). Individuals can be more likely to approach novel foods with conspecifics present (Gómez-Laplaza and Morgan 1986;Sherwin 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%