2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2004)130:2(121)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-Based Method for Selecting Bridge Scour Countermeasures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Adey, Hajdin, and Brü hwiler (2003) presented a risk-based approach to determining the optimal intervention for a bridge subject to multiple hazards. Johnson and Niezgoda (2004) presented a risk-based method for ranking, comparing and choosing the most appropriate bridge scour countermeasures using the risk priority numbers (PRNs) in failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Stein, Young, Trent, and Pearson (1999) developed a risk-based method for assessing the risk associated with scour threat to bridge foundations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Adey, Hajdin, and Brü hwiler (2003) presented a risk-based approach to determining the optimal intervention for a bridge subject to multiple hazards. Johnson and Niezgoda (2004) presented a risk-based method for ranking, comparing and choosing the most appropriate bridge scour countermeasures using the risk priority numbers (PRNs) in failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Stein, Young, Trent, and Pearson (1999) developed a risk-based method for assessing the risk associated with scour threat to bridge foundations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability analysis were applied by Johnson and Ayyub (1992), Johnson (1992), Johnson and Dock (1998), Ghosn and Johnson (2000), Yanmaz and Ustun (2001), Yanmaz (2002), Johnson and Niezgoda (2004), Siddiqui et al (2004), Muzammil et al (2006), Muzzammil and Siddiqui (2009), Adeel et al (2016) and Khalid et al (2017). The probabilistic scour depth prediction of bridge pier initially raised by Johnson and Ayyub (1992) and presented a reliable method by including uncertainties involved in various basic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Adey ,Hajdin , and Bruhwiler presented a risk-based approach to determine the optimal intervention for a bridge that is subject to multiple hazards [1].Johnson and Niezgoda presented a risk-based method for ranking, comparing, and choosing the most appropriate bridge scour countermeasures by using the risk priority numbers (PRNs) in failure modes and effects analysis(FMEA) [2]. Stein, Young, Trent, and Pearson developed a risk-based method for assessing the risk associated with scour failure or heavy damage and the cost associated with the failure,andis also adjusted by a risk adjustment factor based on the foundation type and the type of span [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%