2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk management of viral infectious diseases in wastewater reclamation and reuse: Review

Abstract: Inappropriate usage of reclaimed wastewater has caused outbreaks of viral infectious diseases worldwide. International and domestic guidelines for wastewater reuse stipulate that virus infection risks are to be regulated by the multiple-barrier system, in which a wastewater treatment process composed of sequential treatment units is designed based on the pre-determined virus removal efficiency of each unit. The objectives of this review were to calculate representative values of virus removal efficiency in was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
101
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
101
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantification data for viruses in wastewater commonly include a significant number of nondetects (31). Depending on environmental and physical factors, such as the lack of homogeneity of viral particles in water bodies, formation of aggregates with organic matter, or binding to suspended solids (32), virus density in wastewaters may fall below the quantification limit (nondetect) of the analytical methods employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification data for viruses in wastewater commonly include a significant number of nondetects (31). Depending on environmental and physical factors, such as the lack of homogeneity of viral particles in water bodies, formation of aggregates with organic matter, or binding to suspended solids (32), virus density in wastewaters may fall below the quantification limit (nondetect) of the analytical methods employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, each qualifying unit process within a treatment train (e.g., ozonation, filtration, etc.) is awarded an LRV for each target pathogen (Sano et al 2016;SWRCB 2016;Amarasiri et al 2017). The sum of the LRVs across the whole treatment train is then calculated for each pathogen and compared against regulatory requirements or public health benchmarks (e.g., 10 −4 annual risk of infection).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sewer treatment systems, the primary treatment of simple sedimentation did not show removal of viruses (Simmons, 2011). However, noroviruses are removed in secondary treatments, as systematically reviewed (Sano, 2016). Norovirus log 10 removal by activated sludge systems is estimated to be 1.48 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-2.00) and 1.35 (95% CI: 0.52-2.18) for norovirus GI and GII, respectively.…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sapovirus was effectively (>2 Log 10 ) removed by MBR (Miura et al, 2015). Log 10 removal efficiency of norovirus GII by MBR is estimated from meta-analysis to be 3.35 (95% CI: 2.39-4.30) (Sano, 2016).…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%