1990
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of spontaneous abortion among nurses handling antineoplastic drugs.

Abstract: of spontaneous abortion among nurses hand ling antineo plastic drugs. Scand J Work Environ Health 1990;16:102-7 . The purpo se of the study was to evaluate the frequency of spontaneous abortion in two groups of women. One group consisted of women regularly involved in the preparation of cancer chemothe rapy perfusions and therefore considered to be exposed to cytostatic agents; the other consisted of women not occupationally exposed to such agents. The study was carried out in four French hospitals. Four hun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
72
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…various types of exposure: antineoplastic drugs (20), solvents (21), anesthetic gases (22,23), and ethylene oxide (24). This phenomenon tends to suggest that the level of exposure that we studied is prone to have detectable adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…various types of exposure: antineoplastic drugs (20), solvents (21), anesthetic gases (22,23), and ethylene oxide (24). This phenomenon tends to suggest that the level of exposure that we studied is prone to have detectable adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[16][17][18] Previous studies have had mixed results, and many suffer from limited sample sizes. The three largest studies [19][20][21] showed increased risks for spontaneous abortion with self-reported first trimester exposure through handling or mixing, mostly among oncology nurses or pharmacists (ORs ranging from 1.5-2.3) in samples that included from 18 to 223 exposed cases. Other studies did not find statistically significant associations [22][23][24][25][26][27] with ORs ranging from 0.7-2.8, and limited sample sizes (3 to 34 exposed cases).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В исследованиях, проведенных до 1990 г., отсутствуют описания мер пре-досторожности при работе c противоопухолевыми пре-паратами, и можно полагать, что они были менее стро-гими, чем в последующие годы. Несмотря на то, что исследования были проведены в разных странах с использованием различных эпидемиологических ме-тодов, в большинстве из них отмечался статистически значимый повышенный риск спонтанных абортов и врожденных пороков развития (ВПР) у потомства медицинского персонала с экспозицией к цитостатикам (р <0,05) [42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
unclassified