“…The purpose of this study is three-fold: (1) to record PTS and PTG of the general population due to COVID-19; (2) to explore the predictors of PTS and PTG, including the basic demographic information (e.g., sex and education), COVID-19 pandemic-related information (e.g., diagnosis and quarantine), psychological and physical reactions to COVID-19 (e.g., avoidance and insomnia), and on-the-spot mood (e.g., happy or sad on the testing day); (3) to examine the underlying relationship between PTS and PTG after the above predictors were controlled (i.e., hierarchical regression analyses). Referencing the previous publications, we predicted that being female (e.g., Liu et al, 2020 ), low-educated (e.g., L. Liang et al, 2020 ), quarantined (e.g., Wathelet et al., 2021 ), diagnosed with COVID-19 (e.g., Xiao et al, 2020 ), and clinical workers (e.g., Blekas et al, 2020 ), and having negative psychological or physical reactions to the pandemic (e.g., Yin et al, 2021 ) could all be stressors of PTS. More importantly, anticipating a ‘phoenix renascence’ ( Tamiolaki & Kalaitzaki, 2020 ), we propose a mutual positive prediction between the PTS and the PTG.…”