2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-020-02430-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk screening of the potential invasiveness of non-native aquatic species in Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the AS-ISK applications that have been implemented successfully for screening invasive alien marine organisms on a global and regional scale [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], there is a study that used the previous version of the AS-ISK application (FISK) for risk assessment of ornamental fish [42]. However, no study exists in which the risk assessments of the species screened in this study have been compared (except for Pomacanthus maculosus and Zebrasoma flavescens).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the AS-ISK applications that have been implemented successfully for screening invasive alien marine organisms on a global and regional scale [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], there is a study that used the previous version of the AS-ISK application (FISK) for risk assessment of ornamental fish [42]. However, no study exists in which the risk assessments of the species screened in this study have been compared (except for Pomacanthus maculosus and Zebrasoma flavescens).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One successful application of ecological risk screening for non-native species was for invasive freshwater fish, and is known as the Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (FISK) [8]. Similarly, several successful risk assessment studies have been carried out globally or regionally for screening freshwater and marine ecosystems against non-native species [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The FISK tool was later developed to cover plants and animals in marine, brackish and freshwater systems, and is now known as the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Map of the two risk-assessment (RA) areas (the lower Pearl River basin in South China and the Chao Phraya River basin in Thailand) for which non-native ornamental freshwater fish species were screened using the AS-ISK. The two RA areas fall within the 'Oriental biogeographic' region (Lévêque et al, 2008) and the 'Southern Asia' grouping of freshwater ecoregions (Abell et al, 2008) Interesova, Moghaddas et al, 2021;Ruykys et al, 2021). The latest version of the AS-ISK offers assessors 32 language options, including Thai and simplified Chinese, for carrying out their risk screenings (Copp et al, 2021).…”
Section: Risk Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…species based on an ad hoc threshold weighted according to the range of high-risk score values for both the BRA and BRA+CCA (Clarke et al, 2020;Interesova, Vilizzi & Copp, 2020;Killi et al, 2020;Uyan et al, 2020;Moghaddas et al, 2021;Ruykys et al, 2021).…”
Section: Risk Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These impacts could be chemical accumulations (e.g., heavy metals, antifouling biocides, aquaculture medicinal products, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and warfare agents by anthropogenic inputs) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], nutrient loads [8,11,12,16,17], organic matter deposited in sediment [11,12,18], and habitat destruction [8,19,20] as well as negative interaction of invasive species with wild fish [21,22]. Aquaculture is also known to cause an increase in eutrophication [23][24][25][26][27] and algal blooms [28][29][30][31] in coastal waters, a reduction in dissolved oxygen in seawater [32], and expanded dead zones for coastal waters [33,34]. In addition, the increased culture in coastal waters could overload the environmental carrying capacity [35] and cause outbreaks of diseases [36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%