Where policy is concerned, academic discussion of alcohol and illicit drugs frequently emphasises their disparities. This is understandable, to a degree, as the criminal law upholds a 'great regulatory divide ' (Seddon, 2010: 56) decades. Drawing on various policy documents and commentaries, we look at recent developments relating to the control and regulation of drugs and alcohol in the broader areas of criminal justice and welfare reform. We conclude that, although the great regulatory divide remains firmly intact, illicit drugs and alcohol policies are becoming more closely aligned, especially in regards to the respective significance of abstinence (or abstinence-based 'recovery'). Importantly, it is contended that this new historical direction in policy should be understood in reference to an evolving governmental concern for the apparently problematic behaviour of a social underclass.