2011 6th International ICST Conference on Communications and Networking in China (CHINACOM) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/chinacom.2011.6158308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Road condition monitoring using on-board Three-axis Accelerometer and GPS Sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the profiled studies in the U.S., Finland, Poland, Latvia, Romania, Australia, and New Zealand showed that smartphone devices could be used to differentiate between "good" and "bad" pavement, identify the existence of road defects, and differentiate among road defects, they did not present their data in terms of an industry standard metric, such as IRI. Researchers in China did attempt to develop a low-cost accelerometer and GPS sensor approach to collect IRI data directly, though it was not smartphone-based (Kongyang et al 2011). While concluding their system was effective, they did not employ a baseline IRI for comparison, conducted their data collection at 40 km/h (below the recommended 50-80 km/h data collection speed outlined in Sayers et al), and classified IRI values of 4.9 m/km as "smooth" roads, which does not correspond to the subjective roughness descriptions in Sayers et al (1986).…”
Section: The Potential Of Consumer Technology For Pavement Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the profiled studies in the U.S., Finland, Poland, Latvia, Romania, Australia, and New Zealand showed that smartphone devices could be used to differentiate between "good" and "bad" pavement, identify the existence of road defects, and differentiate among road defects, they did not present their data in terms of an industry standard metric, such as IRI. Researchers in China did attempt to develop a low-cost accelerometer and GPS sensor approach to collect IRI data directly, though it was not smartphone-based (Kongyang et al 2011). While concluding their system was effective, they did not employ a baseline IRI for comparison, conducted their data collection at 40 km/h (below the recommended 50-80 km/h data collection speed outlined in Sayers et al), and classified IRI values of 4.9 m/km as "smooth" roads, which does not correspond to the subjective roughness descriptions in Sayers et al (1986).…”
Section: The Potential Of Consumer Technology For Pavement Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their vibration-based system consisted of a low-cost three-axis MEMS accelerometer and a global positioning system (GPS) sensor (this is a typical combination of devices for the described solutions), which, together with an Arduino board, were embedded in a road vehicle in order to monitor roads' condition and potential anomalies. The authors proved that such a solution is less expensive than previously known as [2][3][4]. It was also less expensive than at least one another device using the Arduino board presented in [5].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is chance to not collect exact GPS data due to various environmental condition such as tunnels, high building, shady trees etc. [11]. An efficient approach to reduce such types of error is not available.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%