Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Outcome and cost analyses of a matched case–control study

Sarlos, Dimitri; Kots, LaVonne; Stevanovic, Nebojsa; Габриэль, С. А.

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012

Cited by 161 publications

(144 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

126

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Affirming the finding that RH cases cost more, we found that the total cost estimates for RH are consistently higher by $2489 per case (12,15,16). Unfortunately, the greater costs associated with RH were not reflected in improvement in outcomes.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 61%

“…The rapid uptake of robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RH) for benign gynecologic disease has expanded the options for achieving a minimally invasive hysterectomy; however, the available data about its comparative effectiveness has been limited to observational studies and two randomized trials which in total include 148 subjects (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). These studies have demonstrated similar outcomes between RH and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) with higher costs for robotic-assisted procedures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Rosero

Kho

Joshi

et al. 2014

Obstetrical &Amp; Gynecological Survey

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective-Utilization of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions is increasing. Using the most recent, available nationwide data, we examined clinical outcomes, safety, and cost of robotic compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy.Methods-Women undergoing robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease were identified from the United States 2009 and 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Propensity scores derived from a logistic regression model were used to assemble matched cohorts of patients undergoing robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Differences in in-hospital complications, hospital length of stay, and hospital charges were assessed between the matched groups.Results-Of the 804,551 hysterectomies for benign conditions performed in 2009 and 2010, 20.6% were laparoscopic and 5.1% robotically-assisted. Among minimally invasive hysterectomies, the use of robotic hysterectomy increased from 9.5% to 13.6% (P=0.002). In a propensity-matched analysis, the overall complication rates were similar between robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy (8.80 vs. 8 Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. HHS Public Access Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author ManuscriptConclusion-The utilization of robotic hysterectomy has increased. Perioperative outcomes are similar between laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy, but robotic cases cost substantially more.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 61%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Rosero

Kho

Joshi

et al. 2014

Obstetrical &Amp; Gynecological Survey

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Robot-assisted hysterectomy can be implemented and can be performed quickly by a surgeon with laparoscopic experience [42,43]. Since the expenses and the operating time are far greater than those for conventional laparoscopy, in view of the limited resources, the use of robot-assisted hysterectomy must be decided on a case-by-case basis [44][45][46][47]. Systematic overview articles on robot-assisted hysterectomy With regard to quality of life, Sarlos et al…”

Section: Robot-assisted Hysterectomymentioning

confidence: 99%

Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)

Neis

Zubke

Römer

et al. 2016

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hintergrund: Offizielle Leitlinie, publiziert und koordiniert von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG), der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (OEGGG) und der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (SGGG). Durch die Einführung laparoskopischer Operationen wurde die vaginale und abdominale Hysterektomie um 3 weitere Techniken ergänzt. Um die Indikationsfelder abzugrenzen, wurde die Leitlinie "Indikation und Methodik der Hysterektomie bei benignen Erkrankungen" initiiert. Organerhaltende Therapiealternativen wurden ebenfalls integriert. Methode: Die Leitlinie wurde durch ein repräsentatives Gremium von 26 Experten aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz unter strukturierter unabhängiger Moderation im Konsens erstellt. Die systematische Literatursuche und-bewertung zu Nutzen und Schaden der Therapiealternativen bei symptomatischem Uterus myomatosus, funktionellen Blutungsstörungen und Adenomyosis sowie ein Vergleich der Hysterektomieverfahren erfolgte bis 06/2014 in der Datenbank MEDLINE mit Fokus auf aggregierter Evidenz. Ergebnisse: Alle Formen der Hysterektomie sind in Studien mit einer hohen Zufriedenheit der Patientinnen verbunden. Der vaginalen Hysterektomie soll gegenüber der abdominellen, wenn möglich, der Vorzug gegeben werden. Ist die vaginale Hysterektomie nicht möglich, sollte die Möglichkeit einer laparoskopischen Hysterektomie geprüft werden. Die abdominale Hysterektomie sollte nur bei gesonderter Indikation durchgeführt werden. Für die organerhaltenden Alternativen wurde ebenfalls ein hoher Zufriedenheitsgrad festgestellt, allerdings können bei Belassen des Uterus Rezidive auftreten.

show abstract

“…Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy has gained popularity, especially in the USA, and might have the potential to help increase the proportion of laparoscopic hysterectomies [3]. Outcomes appear comparable to standard laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy, but it is more costly [4][5][6][7]. One of the potential benefits for the patient might be reduction of post-operative pain [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They also show higher costs [5,17,22]. To overcome disadvantages of longer operative time and higher costs, we believe that RALH might become beneficial for the patients only if technology improves and leads to less invasive procedures such as single-port RALH.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Perioperative outcomes of three-port robotically assisted hysterectomy: a continuous series of 53 cases

Dällenbach

Petignat

2014

J Robotic Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of 3-port robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH), using a consecutive series of women who underwent 3-port RALH in a university hospital. From November 2010 until June 2013 we operated on 53 women, whose mean age was 48.4 ± 7.7 years (range 35-68 years), and mean body mass index was 27.1 ± 5.1 kg/m 2 (range 19.5-42.9 kg/ m 2 ). The indications for hysterectomy were myoma in 31 (58.5 %), adenomyosis in 10 (18.9 %), cervical dysplasia in 4 (7.5 %), neoplasia in 4 (7.5 %), and recurrent polyps or postmenopausal bleeding in the remaining 4 women (7.5 %). We performed total RALH in 50 cases (94.3 %) and subtotal in the others. The median duration of total intervention was 169 min (interquartile range 147.5-206.5 min). The mean weight of the uterus was 209.8 ± 166.6 g (range 36-790 g) and mean estimated blood loss was 72.3 ± 75.9 ml (range 0-300 ml). There were no perioperative complications, in particular no blood transfusions nor conversions to laparotomy. The median hospital stay was 4 days (interquartile range 3-4 days). One patient was reoperated 1 month later for vaginal vault hematoma and another was readmitted 3 weeks post-operatively due to vaginal vault dehiscence after premature intercourse, but did not require reoperation. Three-port RALH is feasible and safe for simple hysterectomy. We believe this experience using minimum ports to be useful to prepare for robotically assisted single-port hysterectomy.

show abstract

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Outcome and cost analyses of a matched case–control study

Cited by 161 publications

References 16 publications

Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease

Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)

Perioperative outcomes of three-port robotically assisted hysterectomy: a continuous series of 53 cases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About