2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust classification approach for segmentation of blood defects in cod fillets based on deep convolutional neural networks and support vector machines and calculation of gripper vectors for robotic processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(2018) Grading ACO-BPANN RMSEp ​= ​6.3834 ​mg/100g, R ​= ​0.7542 Khulal et al. (2016) Cod Fillets Grading SVM, CNN accuracy ​= ​100% with CNN Misimi et al. (2017) Fish Grading PCA, BP-ANN accuracy ​= ​93.33% Huang et al.…”
Section: Machine Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018) Grading ACO-BPANN RMSEp ​= ​6.3834 ​mg/100g, R ​= ​0.7542 Khulal et al. (2016) Cod Fillets Grading SVM, CNN accuracy ​= ​100% with CNN Misimi et al. (2017) Fish Grading PCA, BP-ANN accuracy ​= ​93.33% Huang et al.…”
Section: Machine Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical and machine learning-based data mining methods have been successfully implemented in the development of an improved decision system of aquaculture in the past studies, e.g., fuzzy inference system in the modeling of soil microbial dynamics [18]; optimum-path forest, support vector machine (SVM), Bayes classifier, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and self-organizing maps to control the aquatic weeds (maximum accuracy of 93.27 ± 0.91%) [19]; the decision tree-based ensemble approach (maximum accuracy of 75%), SVM, Bayes network, MLP, and radial basis function in the prediction of shellfish farm closure [20]; time-series classification in the prediction of shellfish farm closure [21]; SVM in the fish species classification [22]; and quadratic classifier and SVM in the classification of feeding and fasted fish (maximum accuracy of 86.3 ± 0.296%) [23], etc. Besides, in some recent studies, artificial bee colony-water temperature mechanism algorithm in the prediction of the temperature of prawn [24], particle swarm optimization to determine the optimal production strategies of fish [25], a neuro-fuzzy method in the feeding system of fish (accuracy of 98%) [26], an ensemble of wrappers in the fish age classification [27], convolutional neural network (CNN) and SVM methods in the classification of normal vs. defective fillets [28], CNN and MLP in the prediction of dissolved oxygen of aquaculture systems [29], and feature extraction algorithms in the automatic tuna sizing [30], etc., have been implemented.…”
Section: Literature Review and Objective Of The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature survey, it is obvious that several statistical and machine learning-based data mining methods have been used in the automation of aquaculture and fisheries for different applications. Amongst them, SVM is the most widely used and successful method [19,20,22,23,28,[31][32][33]. Though, the application of data mining methods specifically the SVM, and its combination with some feature extraction methods in monitoring the growth of the Ohrid trout haven't explored yet.…”
Section: Literature Review and Objective Of The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the field of deep learning has seen adoption in aquaculture. The use of deep neural networks has led to applications ranging from fish identification [13] and fish feeding behavior [12] to segmentation of blood defects in cod fillets [16]. Deep Neural Networks are highly parameterized statistical models used in combination with learning algorithms to approximate the functions underlying the data used to train the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%