2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Hybrid PI Controller with a Simple Adaptation in the Integrator Reset State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the reset controller reduced the overshoot and shortened the settling time significantly while preserving the rise time at a value almost identical to that of the LTI controller. This transient performance improvement is one of the favorable properties of reset control systems, as resetting control input eliminates the acceleration on the outputs at appropriate instants, reducing the overshoot and settling time, see References 4,26‐29. The 2$$ {\mathscr{H}}_2 $$ norm obtained by numerical integration (i.e., t0tfzfalse(tfalse)Tzfalse(tfalse)dt$$ \sqrt{\int_{t_0}^{t_f}z{(t)}^Tz(t) dt} $$) was 1.59 for the reset controller, which was 10.89% smaller than that of the LTI controller.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the reset controller reduced the overshoot and shortened the settling time significantly while preserving the rise time at a value almost identical to that of the LTI controller. This transient performance improvement is one of the favorable properties of reset control systems, as resetting control input eliminates the acceleration on the outputs at appropriate instants, reducing the overshoot and settling time, see References 4,26‐29. The 2$$ {\mathscr{H}}_2 $$ norm obtained by numerical integration (i.e., t0tfzfalse(tfalse)Tzfalse(tfalse)dt$$ \sqrt{\int_{t_0}^{t_f}z{(t)}^Tz(t) dt} $$) was 1.59 for the reset controller, which was 10.89% smaller than that of the LTI controller.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%