2020
DOI: 10.1109/tte.2020.2975313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust LMI-LQR Control for Dual-Active-Bridge DC–DC Converters With High Parameter Uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several research activities have been focused on the control techniques of the DAB during the past few years, see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. A comprehensive overview of different modulation strategies of DAB converters is presented in [1].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several research activities have been focused on the control techniques of the DAB during the past few years, see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. A comprehensive overview of different modulation strategies of DAB converters is presented in [1].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dual active bridge (DAB) converter is considered as one of the most critical emerging topologies that have been successfully used in many electrical power applications such as DC microgrids [1,2]. The DAB offers key advantages such as a minimum size of passive filter components and high-power density when compared with other bidirectional DC-DC converters [3]. Therefore, DAB converter has gained popularity during the last decade in applications such as electric vehicles (EVs), energy management systems or DC microgrids with energy storage systems (ESS) [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation results are shown in Figures 4-11. For comparison, we choose the classical LQR control [35][36][37]. Figures 4 and 5 display the time history of the two system states: x 1 (i.e., μ t ) and x 2 (i.e., y t − y t ), respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several isolated bidirectional typologies have been reported, including two-device topologies such as dual fly-back converter, dual cuk converter and dual-zeta converter [7][8], four-device topologies such as forward flyback converter, dual-push-pull converter, push-pull forward converter, push-forward-fly-back converter, and dual-halfbridge converter [9,10], and eight-device typologies such as dual-active-bridge (DAB) converter [11]. The isolated bidirectional converters, DAB has the lowest volume of filter and largest capacity of power transfer [12]. Such converters consist of two bridges namely low voltage (LV) and high voltage (HV) bridges.Single phase shift (SPS) modulation methods are reported for DIBMS in [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%