2018
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2018.2858547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Single-Shot Fringe Projection Profilometry Based on Morphological Component Analysis

Abstract: In a fringe projection profilometry (FPP) process, the captured fringe images can be modeled as the superimposition of the projected fringe patterns on the texture of the objects. Extracting the fringe patterns from the captured fringe images is an essential procedure in FPP; but traditional single-shot FPP methods often fail to perform if the objects have a highly textured surface. In this paper, a new single-shot FPP algorithm which allows the object texture and fringe pattern to be estimated simultaneously … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the two different clutter dictionaries, MCA-SAR-KSVD achieves a better clutter and noise suppression effect than MCA-SAR-DCT, which means that K-SVD has provided a better clutter dictionary through the adopted iterative training process. To illustrate the clutter and noise suppression performance in a quantitative way, the SCR and BSF are used to evaluate the imaging results, and they are defined as follows [49] (27) where, 𝜇 𝑡 and 𝜇 𝑐 denote the average gray value of the target and non-target areas, respectively, 𝜎 𝑐 is the standard deviation of gray values in non-target areas, and 𝜎 𝑖𝑛 represents that of the non-target areas in the image obtained by RDA. As it is difficult to distinguish noise from the background clutter, the suppression ability for clutter and noise is evaluated together.…”
Section: A Results With Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the two different clutter dictionaries, MCA-SAR-KSVD achieves a better clutter and noise suppression effect than MCA-SAR-DCT, which means that K-SVD has provided a better clutter dictionary through the adopted iterative training process. To illustrate the clutter and noise suppression performance in a quantitative way, the SCR and BSF are used to evaluate the imaging results, and they are defined as follows [49] (27) where, 𝜇 𝑡 and 𝜇 𝑐 denote the average gray value of the target and non-target areas, respectively, 𝜎 𝑐 is the standard deviation of gray values in non-target areas, and 𝜎 𝑖𝑛 represents that of the non-target areas in the image obtained by RDA. As it is difficult to distinguish noise from the background clutter, the suppression ability for clutter and noise is evaluated together.…”
Section: A Results With Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCA is a signal decomposition method based on sparse representation, which uses different dictionaries to decompose the signal into different components containing different types of information [27].…”
Section: B Morphological Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a two-step decoding process consisting of color decoding and geometric decoding, this method achieved high-quality 3D reconstruction. Budianto et al [34] proposed a robust color-coded single-pattern SL method. They implemented an enhanced morphological component analysis method to separate texture and fringe patterns from a single RGB fringe pattern, and this method achieved better performance than the traditional single-pattern methods.…”
Section: A Traditional Single-pattern Structured Light Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional fringe projection contouring is roughly divided into two categories, the first one is phase shift contouring (PSP), which is able to achieve high-resolution phase measurement by taking multiple fringe images with relative phase difference for phase extraction, but it is easy to be subjected to external interference, and difficult to be applied in dynamic measurements [5]. The second category is the single-frame fringe analysis method represented by Fourier transform contouring (FTP), which achieves phase information extraction using only a single fringe image, but it is difficult to deal with the discontinuous jumps between the phases of two neighbouring point parcels [6]. Compared with PSP, single-frame FPP can acquire 3D information at one time, which is very suitable for measuring moving objects or dynamic 3D reconstruction, but its accuracy is lower than that of PSP.Therefore, whether it is possible to quickly and accurately reconstruct the 3D morphology of an object from a single-frame fringe pattern has become an important area of FPP research [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%