Rohstoffsicherung in der Landes- und Regionalplanung

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Mineralische Rohstoffe finden in nahezu allen Produktionszweigen Verwendung. Die Rohstoffgewinnung steht dabei in einem Wettbewerb mit anderen Flächennutzungen und trifft vielerorts auf wenig Akzeptanz. Der Raumordnung kommt eine wichtige Rolle bei der Flächenvorsorge für die Rohstoffgewinnung wie auch bei der langfristigen Sicherung von Rohstoffpotenzialen zu. Im Rahmen der Raumordnung erfolgt die Abwägung mit anderen Raumnutzungen und Raumfunktionen im Sinne einer nachhaltigen Raumentwicklung. Der Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, wie die Landes- und Regionalplanung dieser Aufgabe in Bezug auf nichtenergetische mineralische Rohstoffe nachkommt. Die Ergebnisse von Befragungen und Plananalysen zeigen, dass der Regelungsumfang zur Rohstoffsicherung in den Planwerken der Länder und Regionen teils sehr deutlich variiert. Darauf aufbauend werden Lösungsansätze für eine angemessene Berücksichtigung der Rohstoffsicherung in der Landes- und Regionalplanung aufgezeigt. Diese beziehen sich sowohl auf die methodischen Herausforderungen im Zuge der Abwägung als auch auf die Ausgestaltung des raumordnerischen Instrumentariums.

Localizing and prioritizing roof greening opportunities for urban heat island mitigation: insights from the city of Krefeld, Germany

“…The vulnerability assessment considered the location of settlement areas, but ignored the adaptive capacities of heat-sensitive population groups (i.e., the ability to prepare for, respond to, and cope with heat events), given the lack of suitable tested methods and indicators (cf. Heiland et al 2012;Hartz et al 2013;UBA 2021). Future applications could try to advance this, for example by drawing on insights from valuation approaches of people's adaptive capacity as those by Siders (2019), Buth et al (2015) and Hemberger and Utz (2014).…”

Sensitive infrastructures and people with disabilities – Key issues when strengthening resilience in reconstruction

“…Sensitive infrastructures: Sensitive infrastructures with a particularly vulnerable population or user group have not yet been the focus of attention. In fact, there is not even a standardized definition in Germany, as is the case with critical infrastructures (Hartz et al, 2020). Furthermore, in the US, for example, the concept of critical infrastructure is defined more broadly by the Federal Emergency Agency (FEMA) than is the case in Europe and Germany -here the concept of critical infrastructure 125 includes not only facilities that are vital for the population, but also, for example, facilities that are essential for the protection of specific population groups (Federal Emergency and Management Agency, 2007).…”

“…Greiving et al (2023) however, provide a proposal for the term of sensitive infrastructures -they define it as infrastructures that are used by groups of people who require assistance from third parties in the event of an incident. This is partly in line with a description of the term in a publication by the German Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development, whereby the 130 term in this publication is not limited exclusively to facilities whose users are dependent on assistance in the event of an incident, but also includes other infrastructures that can be of great importance to the community and whose users or uses are very vulnerable, but whose failure does not necessarily lead to significant supply shortages or threats to public safety (Hartz et al, 2020). In addition to kindergartens, school facilities for children with disabilities or retirement and care homes, these can also include large stables in agricultural production, for instance.…”

“…Protection worthiness: Protection worthiness is a political-normative concept, therefore a broad discourse and a politically 145 legitimized system of objectives is necessary to determine which infrastructures belong to this concept (Hartz et al, 2020) whereby, depending on the political norm, critical as well as sensitive, endangering and particularly meaningful infrastructures can be included (see Table 1 and (Greiving et al, 2023)). If the concept is applied in spatial planning, this means that certain land uses and spatial functions are given greater weight in the question of protection -with corresponding consequences in the context of a balancing process (Hartz et al, 2020;Greiving, 2023).…”

Electric-impulse-technology: results of a basic investigation into the use of the technology as a selective demolition method in the construction industry

“…The supply and flow of raw materials in Germany have been the subject of political, scientific and corporate activities for several years. The first raw materials strategy of the Federal Republic of Germany was published in 2010 with a focus on raw materials supply and has since been updated at regular intervals and reviewed by a raw materials policy compass of the Federal Government (Hartz et al, 2018). The extraction of raw materials in Germany was 1041 million tons in 2015 (Löschel et al, 2020).…”