1979
DOI: 10.2307/3676340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Heredity in Egg Size Variation in the Great Tit Parus major and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
94
1
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
12
94
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, females succeeded in laying larger eggs in the experimental clutch. In the Great Tit, larger eggs contain more energy (Ojanen 1983). Furthermore, fledging success and adult survival of experimental birds were unaffected.…”
Section: Integration Of Parent and Offspring Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, females succeeded in laying larger eggs in the experimental clutch. In the Great Tit, larger eggs contain more energy (Ojanen 1983). Furthermore, fledging success and adult survival of experimental birds were unaffected.…”
Section: Integration Of Parent and Offspring Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wawrzyniak & Sohns 1986). To date, repeatability of egg dimensions has been studied only in a few small Passerines, mainly hole-nesting species (Ojanen et al 1979, van Noordvijk 1987. Studies on repeatability of egg dimensions in ground, open nest species are exceptionally rare (but see Hendricks 1991), while data from marshland species are completely lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of temperature versus other factors affecting egg volum e M any authors agree that 60-80% of the variation in egg size can be attributed to the m aternal effects (Ojanen et al 1979, van Noordw ijk et al 1981, Potti 1993), but it is not possible to separate the di rect additive genetic variance from the m aternal en vironm ental variance (Roff 1997). In the Goldcrest, the m ean tem perature during the periods of 3, 4, 5, 7, or 9 days before laying accounted for 7-10% of the variation in egg weight, and during the period of 11 days for 11% (H aftom 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%