2019
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201904306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Room‐Temperature Micropillar Growth of Lithium–Titanate–Carbon Composite Structures by Self‐Biased Direct Current Magnetron Sputtering for Lithium Ion Microbatteries

Abstract: crystalline phases are demonstrated as an anode material in Li-ion microbatteries. The described micropillar fabrication method is a low-cost, substrate independent, single-step, room-temperature vacuum process utilizing a mature industrial complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS)-compatible technology. Furthermore, tentative consideration is given to the effects of selected deposition parameters and the growth process, as based on extensive physical and chemical characterization. Additional studies are,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 3a, b, both samples display a granular surface with voided boundaries resulting from particle agglomeration due to the low-temperature substrates and long target-substrate distance, which causes adatoms to have low kinetic energy when reaching the substrate surface according to the Thornton structure zone model [21,[41][42][43]. The microsized surface roughness increases the specific surface area in contact with the electrolyte, thus promoting the lithium-ion transport.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 3a, b, both samples display a granular surface with voided boundaries resulting from particle agglomeration due to the low-temperature substrates and long target-substrate distance, which causes adatoms to have low kinetic energy when reaching the substrate surface according to the Thornton structure zone model [21,[41][42][43]. The microsized surface roughness increases the specific surface area in contact with the electrolyte, thus promoting the lithium-ion transport.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the manufacturing process of 3D microbatteries, the key step would be to fabricate the 3D architectures of electrodes, such as vertically aligned nanowires, nanorods, nanoporous monoliths, and multi-layered stacks. 8 In the past two decades, substantially advanced techniques have been utilized to build individual 3D electrodes or microbatteries, 9 such as wet or dry etching, [10][11][12] photopatterning, 13,14 sputtering, [15][16][17] electrodeposition, [18][19][20][21] chemical vapor deposition (CVD), 22,23 atomic layer deposition (ALD), 24,25 physical vapor deposition (PVD), 26 and other combinations thereof. Although some of these relatively new approaches have demonstrated potential exciting paths, the commercialization of microbatteries is however still in the early and formative stage.…”
Section: Context and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other main fabrication methods is deposition [37], including magnetron sputtering [54,55], electron beam evaporation [56,57], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [58,59], physical vapor deposition (PVD) [58,60], electrodeposition (ED) [61][62][63], sol-gel deposition [64], PLD [65][66][67], ESD [68,69], etc. Among them, atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a typical CVD [70,71].…”
Section: Fabrication Of µLibsmentioning
confidence: 99%